GGT vs SPY
Gabelli MultiMedia Trust vs State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
Which is better, GGT or SPY?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GGT | SPY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.70% | 0.09%Best |
| AUM | $253M | $804.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 24.05% | 0.98% |
| Holdings | 226 | 505 |
| YTD Return | +10.18% | +12.47%Best |
| 1Y Return | +14.26% | +17.51%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.25% | +21.18%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -1.26% | +12.88%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 26.1% | 14.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -82.7% | -56.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $9,386 | $18,327Best |
| Fund Family | Gabelli Funds | State Street Investment Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 15, 1994 | Jan 22, 1993 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 18, 2002 to Sep 11, 2026 (24.5 years).
GGT vs SPY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 24.5 years both funds cover.
GGT vs SPY Performance
Gabelli MultiMedia Trust (GGT) is an ETF from Gabelli Funds and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year GGT returned +14.26% while SPY returned +17.51%. Year to date, GGT is up 10.18% versus a gain of 12.47% for SPY.
Over three years, GGT compounded at +3.25% per year against +21.18% for SPY; over five years the annualized figures are -1.26% and +12.88% respectively. Across the full 25-year window we track, SPY has the edge at +8.31% annualized vs +0.15%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GGT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.1% compared with 14.9% for SPY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -82.7% for GGT and -56.5% for SPY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GGT charges 1.70% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $170 vs $9 annually, a gap of $161 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GGT currently yields 24.05% against 0.98% for SPY.
Holdings Overlap
At least 36.1% of SPY's money is in holdings GGT also owns.
Only one direction is shown: for GGT, our book for it lists positions totalling 132.3% of the fund, which is what a leveraged book looks like and is not a denominator we can divide by.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 126 days apart, GGT as of Mar 31, 2026 and SPY as of Aug 4, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
35 positions in common, counted across the 210 positions we hold weights for in GGT and 504 in SPY, against full books of 226 and 505.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GGT | Weight in SPY | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| GOOGLAlphabet A Usd 0.001 | 6.22% | 3.33% | 2.89% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 1.78% | 6.83% | 5.05% |
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 0.29% | 7.71% | 7.42% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 1.72% | 5.50% | 3.78% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 1.71% | 4.08% | 2.37% |
| GLWCorning Inc. | 3.39% | 0.19% | 3.20% |
| ECHOEchostar Corp Class A | 3.39% | 0.02% | 3.37% |
| METAMeta Platforms, Inc. | 1.46% | 1.94% | 0.48% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 0.37% | 2.97% | 2.60% |
| NFLXNetflix, Inc. | 2.65% | 0.47% | 2.18% |
36.1% of SPY is already inside GGT.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GGT or SPY?
GGT has an expense ratio of 1.70% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option, by $161 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GGT or SPY?
Over the past year GGT returned +14.26% vs +17.51% for SPY, so SPY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (25 years), GGT annualized +0.15% vs +8.31% for SPY. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GGT or SPY?
GGT has been the more volatile fund at 26.1% annualized versus 14.9% for SPY. Worst drawdown: GGT -82.7% vs SPY -56.5%.
Should I hold both GGT and SPY?
GGT and SPY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GGT and SPY?
At least 36.1% of SPY's money is in holdings GGT also owns. Our book for GGT is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 35 positions in common, counted across the 210 positions we hold weights for in GGT and 504 in SPY.
Which pays a higher dividend, GGT or SPY?
GGT yields 24.05% while SPY yields 0.98%, so GGT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SPY better than GGT?
SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.