GGT vs VTI
Gabelli MultiMedia Trust vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GGT | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.70% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $259M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 24.06% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 226 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +11.03% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +18.69% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +7.03% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.89% | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 26.1% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -82.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Gabelli Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 15, 1994 | May 24, 2001 |
GGT vs VTI Performance
Gabelli MultiMedia Trust (GGT) is a ETF from Gabelli Funds and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GGT returned +18.69% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, GGT is up 11.03% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, GGT compounded at +7.03% per year against +21.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -0.89% and +12.01% respectively. Across the full 24-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.09% annualized vs +0.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GGT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.1% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -82.7% for GGT and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GGT charges 1.70% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $170 vs $3 annually, a gap of $167 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GGT currently yields 24.06% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
GGT and VTI share 75 holdings out of 2922 unique holdings combined, representing a 13.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GGT or VTI?
GGT has an expense ratio of 1.70% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $167 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GGT or VTI?
Over the past year GGT returned +18.69% vs +22.35% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (24 years), GGT annualized +0.18% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GGT or VTI?
GGT has been the more volatile fund at 26.1% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: GGT -82.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both GGT and VTI?
GGT and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GGT and VTI?
GGT and VTI share 75 common holdings with a 13.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2922 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GGT or VTI?
GGT yields 24.06% while VTI yields 1.07%, so GGT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.