GGT vs VTI
Gabelli MultiMedia Trust vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, GGT or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GGT | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.70% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $253M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 24.05% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 226 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +10.45% | +12.08%Best |
| 1Y Return | +14.29% | +16.31%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.86% | +20.83%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.93% | +11.89%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 26.1% | 15.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -82.7% | -56.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $9,544 | $17,537Best |
| Fund Family | Gabelli Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 15, 1994 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 18, 2002 to Sep 14, 2026 (24.5 years).
GGT vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 24.5 years both funds cover.
GGT vs VTI Performance
Gabelli MultiMedia Trust (GGT) is an ETF from Gabelli Funds and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GGT returned +14.29% while VTI returned +16.31%. Year to date, GGT is up 10.45% versus a gain of 12.08% for VTI.
Over three years, GGT compounded at +4.86% per year against +20.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -0.93% and +11.89% respectively. Across the full 25-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.57% annualized vs +0.16%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GGT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.1% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -82.7% for GGT and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GGT charges 1.70% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $170 vs $3 annually, a gap of $167 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GGT currently yields 24.05% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 31.6% of VTI's money is in holdings GGT also owns.
Only one direction is shown: for GGT, our book for it lists positions totalling 128.7% of the fund, which is what a leveraged book looks like and is not a denominator we can divide by.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 122 days apart, GGT as of Mar 31, 2026 and VTI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
84 positions in common, counted across the 210 positions we hold weights for in GGT and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 226 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GGT | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 6.22% | 2.90% | 3.32% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 1.78% | 6.29% | 4.51% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 0.29% | 6.40% | 6.11% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 1.72% | 4.79% | 3.07% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 1.71% | 3.65% | 1.94% |
| GLWCorning Inc. | 3.39% | 0.15% | 3.24% |
| SATS'echostar Communications Corp. Class 'a'' | 3.39% | 0.02% | 3.37% |
| BATRKAtlanta Braves Holdings Inc_None_None | 3.33% | 0.00% | 3.33% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.46% | 1.70% | 0.24% |
| NFLXNetflix, Inc. | 2.65% | 0.42% | 2.23% |
31.6% of VTI is already inside GGT.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GGT or VTI?
GGT has an expense ratio of 1.70% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $167 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GGT or VTI?
Over the past year GGT returned +14.29% vs +16.31% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (25 years), GGT annualized +0.16% vs +8.57% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GGT or VTI?
GGT has been the more volatile fund at 26.1% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: GGT -82.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both GGT and VTI?
GGT and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GGT and VTI?
At least 31.6% of VTI's money is in holdings GGT also owns. Our book for GGT is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 84 positions in common, counted across the 210 positions we hold weights for in GGT and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, GGT or VTI?
GGT yields 24.05% while VTI yields 1.03%, so GGT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than GGT?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.