GGT vs QQQ
Gabelli MultiMedia Trust vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, GGT or QQQ?
QQQ has been ahead.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GGT | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.70% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $253M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 24.05% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 226 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +10.45% | +15.94%Best |
| 1Y Return | +14.29% | +20.44%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.86% | +24.86%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.93% | +14.26%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 26.1% | 19.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -82.7% | -53.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $9,544 | $19,475Best |
| Fund Family | Gabelli Funds | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Nov 15, 1994 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 18, 2002 to Sep 14, 2026 (24.5 years).
GGT vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
GGT vs QQQ Performance
Gabelli MultiMedia Trust (GGT) is an ETF from Gabelli Funds and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year GGT returned +14.29% while QQQ returned +20.44%. Year to date, GGT is up 10.45% versus a gain of 15.94% for QQQ.
Over three years, GGT compounded at +4.86% per year against +24.86% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are -0.93% and +14.26% respectively. Across the full 25-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +12.91% annualized vs +0.16%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GGT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.1% compared with 19.3% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -82.7% for GGT and -53.5% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GGT charges 1.70% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $170 vs $18 annually, a gap of $152 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GGT currently yields 24.05% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
At least 41.5% of QQQ's money is in holdings GGT also owns.
Only one direction is shown: for GGT, our book for it lists positions totalling 128.7% of the fund, which is what a leveraged book looks like and is not a denominator we can divide by.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 127 days apart, GGT as of Mar 31, 2026 and QQQ as of Aug 5, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
14 positions in common, counted across the 210 positions we hold weights for in GGT and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 226 and 107.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GGT | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 6.22% | 3.36% | 2.86% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 1.78% | 7.27% | 5.49% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 0.29% | 8.44% | 8.15% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 1.72% | 5.76% | 4.04% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 1.71% | 4.67% | 2.96% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.46% | 2.78% | 1.32% |
| NFLXNetflix, Inc. | 2.65% | 1.37% | 1.28% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 0.37% | 3.16% | 2.79% |
| TMUST-Mobile Us Inc Com Usd0.00001 | 1.87% | 0.82% | 1.05% |
| INTCIntel Corporation | 0.35% | 2.23% | 1.88% |
41.5% of QQQ is already inside GGT.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GGT or QQQ?
GGT has an expense ratio of 1.70% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $152 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GGT or QQQ?
Over the past year GGT returned +14.29% vs +20.44% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (25 years), GGT annualized +0.16% vs +12.91% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GGT or QQQ?
GGT has been the more volatile fund at 26.1% annualized versus 19.3% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: GGT -82.7% vs QQQ -53.5%.
Should I hold both GGT and QQQ?
GGT and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GGT and QQQ?
At least 41.5% of QQQ's money is in holdings GGT also owns. Our book for GGT is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 14 positions in common, counted across the 210 positions we hold weights for in GGT and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, GGT or QQQ?
GGT yields 24.05% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so GGT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than GGT?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.