GGTL vs IVV
Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, GGTL or IVV?
Each has led over a different period.
GGTL has a lower expense ratio. GGTL led over 1Y, IVV over 3Y and the full window. GGTL is less concentrated, with 37.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GGTL | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.00%Best | 0.03% |
| AUM | $15M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.86% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 71 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +18.21%Best | +12.01% |
| 1Y Return | +17.91%Best | +16.48% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.12% | +21.21%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.95% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.7% | 15.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -23.6% | -23.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.7 years | $15,812 | $17,337Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.5%Best | 37.8% |
| Fund Family | Gabelli Funds | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 5, 2022 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 5, 2022 to Sep 14, 2026 (4.7 years).
GGTL vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.7 years both funds cover.
GGTL vs IVV Performance
Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF (GGTL) is an ETF from Gabelli Funds and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year GGTL returned +17.91% while IVV returned +16.48%. Year to date, GGTL is up 18.21% versus a gain of 12.01% for IVV.
Over three years, GGTL compounded at +19.12% per year against +21.21% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GGTL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.7% compared with 15.7% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.6% for GGTL and -23.4% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GGTL charges 0.00% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $0 vs $3 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GGTL currently yields 0.86% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
38.5% of GGTL's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 30.3% of IVV's money is in holdings GGTL also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
23 positions in common, counted across the 69 positions we hold weights for in GGTL and 490 in IVV, against full books of 71 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 459 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for GGTL (68.4% of the fund), and 13 for GGTL that do not appear in IVV (10.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GGTL | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 2.79% | 8.07% | 5.28% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 2.15% | 5.69% | 3.54% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.12% | 2.65% | 0.47% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 4.16% | 1.16% | 3.00% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 1.03% | 3.84% | 2.81% |
| ORCLOracle Corp - Common | 4.32% | 0.38% | 3.94% |
| ANETArista Networks Inc. | 3.51% | 0.30% | 3.21% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.99% | 1.63% | 0.36% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 0.37% | 3.00% | 2.63% |
| TXNTexas Instrument Inc | 2.10% | 0.36% | 1.74% |
38.5% of GGTL is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GGTL or IVV?
GGTL has an expense ratio of 0.00% while IVV charges 0.03%. GGTL is the cheaper option, by $3 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GGTL or IVV?
Over the past year GGTL returned +17.91% vs +16.48% for IVV, so GGTL leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GGTL or IVV?
GGTL has been the more volatile fund at 18.7% annualized versus 15.7% for IVV. Worst drawdown: GGTL -23.6% vs IVV -23.4%.
Should I hold both GGTL and IVV?
GGTL and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GGTL and IVV?
38.5% of GGTL's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 30.3% of IVV's is in holdings GGTL also owns. They hold 23 positions in common, counted across the 69 positions we hold weights for in GGTL and 490 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, GGTL or IVV?
GGTL yields 0.86% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than GGTL?
GGTL has a lower expense ratio. GGTL led over 1Y, IVV over 3Y and the full window. GGTL is less concentrated, with 37.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.