GII vs IVV
State Street SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, GII or IVV?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GII | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.40% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $936M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.66% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 90 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +3.62% | +12.27%Best |
| 1Y Return | +7.67% | +17.04%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.41% | +21.24%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.82% | +13.08%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.0%Best | 15.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -53.6%Best | -56.5% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,974 | $18,490Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 39.3% | 37.8%Best |
| Fund Family | SPDR State Street Global Advisors | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 25, 2007 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 31, 2007 to Sep 17, 2026 (19.6 years).
GII vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 19.6 years both funds cover.
GII vs IVV Performance
State Street SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII) is an ETF from SPDR State Street Global Advisors and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year GII returned +7.67% while IVV returned +17.04%. Year to date, GII is up 3.62% versus a gain of 12.27% for IVV.
Over three years, GII compounded at +15.41% per year against +21.24% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +9.82% and +13.08% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +9.32% annualized vs +2.67%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.5% compared with 15.0% for GII. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.6% for GII and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GII charges 0.40% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $3 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GII currently yields 2.66% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
35.1% of GII's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 1.9% of IVV's money is in holdings GII also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
18 positions in common, counted across the 75 positions we hold weights for in GII and 490 in IVV, against full books of 90 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 464 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for GII (96.7% of the fund), and 12 for GII that do not appear in IVV (11.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GII | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NEENextera Energy Inc | 4.75% | 0.26% | 4.49% |
| WMBWilliams Cos. Inc. | 3.24% | 0.14% | 3.10% |
| SOSouthern Co. | 2.74% | 0.15% | 2.59% |
| DUKDuke Energy Corp | 2.64% | 0.14% | 2.50% |
| CEGConstellation Energy Corporation Com | 2.42% | 0.13% | 2.29% |
| KMIKinder Morgan Inc./de | 2.23% | 0.10% | 2.13% |
| TRGPTarga Resources Corp Preferred | 2.23% | 0.10% | 2.13% |
| OKEOneok Inc. | 2.14% | 0.09% | 2.05% |
| ADPAutomatic Data Processing, Inc. | 1.93% | 0.17% | 1.76% |
| AEPAmerican Electric Power Co Inc | 1.87% | 0.10% | 1.77% |
35.1% of GII is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GII or IVV?
GII has an expense ratio of 0.40% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $37 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GII or IVV?
Over the past year GII returned +7.67% vs +17.04% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), GII annualized +2.67% vs +9.32% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GII or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.5% annualized versus 15.0% for GII. Worst drawdown: GII -53.6% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both GII and IVV?
GII and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GII and IVV?
35.1% of GII's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 1.9% of IVV's is in holdings GII also owns. They hold 18 positions in common, counted across the 75 positions we hold weights for in GII and 490 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, GII or IVV?
GII yields 2.66% while IVV yields 1.06%, so GII currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than GII?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.