GII vs VOO
State Street SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, GII or VOO?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GII | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.40% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $936M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.66% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 90 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +4.55% | +11.55%Best |
| 1Y Return | +9.12% | +17.54%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.12% | +20.71%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.84% | +12.80%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.0%Best | 14.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -42.9% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,988 | $18,262Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 39.3% | 36.4%Best |
| Fund Family | SPDR State Street Global Advisors | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 25, 2007 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 9, 2010 to Sep 10, 2026 (16 years).
GII vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16 years both funds cover.
GII vs VOO Performance
State Street SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII) is an ETF from SPDR State Street Global Advisors and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GII returned +9.12% while VOO returned +17.54%. Year to date, GII is up 4.55% versus a gain of 11.55% for VOO.
Over three years, GII compounded at +16.12% per year against +20.71% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +9.84% and +12.80% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.35% annualized vs +4.80%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 14.0% for GII. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -42.9% for GII and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GII charges 0.40% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $3 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GII currently yields 2.66% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
36.1% of GII's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 2.0% of VOO's money is in holdings GII also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
18 positions in common, counted across the 74 positions we hold weights for in GII and 505 in VOO, against full books of 90 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 478 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for GII (97.4% of the fund), and 10 for GII that do not appear in VOO (8.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GII | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NEENextera Energy Inc. | 4.82% | 0.28% | 4.54% |
| WMBWilliams Cos. Inc. | 3.01% | 0.14% | 2.87% |
| SOSouthern Co. | 2.85% | 0.17% | 2.68% |
| DUKDuke Energy Corp. | 2.71% | 0.15% | 2.56% |
| CEGConstellation Energy Corp | 2.35% | 0.12% | 2.23% |
| KMIKinder Morgan Inc./de | 2.11% | 0.10% | 2.01% |
| ADPAutomatic Data Processing, Inc. | 2.04% | 0.14% | 1.90% |
| TRGPTarga Resources Corp. | 1.93% | 0.09% | 1.84% |
| AEPAmerican Electric Power Co. Inc. | 1.89% | 0.12% | 1.77% |
| OKEOneok Inc. | 1.90% | 0.08% | 1.82% |
36.1% of GII is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GII or VOO?
GII has an expense ratio of 0.40% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $37 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GII or VOO?
Over the past year GII returned +9.12% vs +17.54% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), GII annualized +4.80% vs +13.35% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GII or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 14.0% for GII. Worst drawdown: GII -42.9% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both GII and VOO?
GII and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GII and VOO?
36.1% of GII's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 2.0% of VOO's is in holdings GII also owns. They hold 18 positions in common, counted across the 74 positions we hold weights for in GII and 505 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, GII or VOO?
GII yields 2.66% while VOO yields 1.04%, so GII currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than GII?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.