GII vs VOO
State Street SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GII | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.40% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $930M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.66% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 88 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +7.51% | +12.25% | |
| 1Y Return | +10.50% | +20.92% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.23% | +21.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.61% | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.0% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -53.6% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | SPDR State Street Global Advisors | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 25, 2007 | Sep 7, 2010 |
GII vs VOO Performance
State Street SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII) is a ETF from SPDR State Street Global Advisors and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GII returned +10.50% while VOO returned +20.92%. Year to date, GII is up 7.51% versus a gain of 12.25% for VOO.
Over three years, GII compounded at +17.23% per year against +21.79% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +10.61% and +13.05% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.45% annualized vs +2.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GII has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.0% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.6% for GII and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GII charges 0.40% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $3 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GII currently yields 2.66% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
GII and VOO share 18 holdings out of 563 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GII or VOO?
GII has an expense ratio of 0.40% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $37 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GII or VOO?
Over the past year GII returned +10.50% vs +20.92% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), GII annualized +2.87% vs +13.45% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GII or VOO?
GII has been the more volatile fund at 15.0% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: GII -53.6% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both GII and VOO?
GII and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GII and VOO?
GII and VOO share 18 common holdings with a 2.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 563 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GII or VOO?
GII yields 2.66% while VOO yields 1.08%, so GII currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.