GLBL vs VYM
Pacer MSCI World Industry Advantage ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GLBL | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $1M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.78% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 367 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +12.35% | +15.34% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.41% | +23.24% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.22% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.6% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -19.8% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 16, 2024 | Nov 10, 2006 |
GLBL vs VYM Performance
Pacer MSCI World Industry Advantage ETF (GLBL) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GLBL returned +21.41% while VYM returned +23.24%. Year to date, GLBL is up 12.35% versus a gain of 15.34% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GLBL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.6% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.8% for GLBL and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GLBL charges 0.65% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $4 annually, a gap of $61 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GLBL currently yields 0.78% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
GLBL and VYM share 69 holdings out of 889 unique holdings combined, representing a 18.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GLBL or VYM?
GLBL has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $61 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GLBL or VYM?
Over the past year GLBL returned +21.41% vs +23.24% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GLBL annualized +19.63% vs +7.04% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GLBL or VYM?
GLBL has been the more volatile fund at 15.6% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: GLBL -19.8% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both GLBL and VYM?
GLBL and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GLBL and VYM?
GLBL and VYM share 69 common holdings with a 18.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 889 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GLBL or VYM?
GLBL yields 0.78% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.