GLBL vs VTI
Pacer MSCI World Industry Advantage ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, GLBL or VTI?
Nearly the same fund. VTI costs less.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. GLBL led over the full window, VTI over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GLBL | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.76% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 366 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +12.45% | +12.57%Best |
| 1Y Return | +15.83% | +17.22%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.87% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.86% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.3% | 13.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -19.8% | -19.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 2 years | $14,178Best | $13,910 |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 16, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 17, 2024 to Sep 11, 2026 (2 years).
GLBL vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2 years both funds cover.
GLBL vs VTI Performance
Pacer MSCI World Industry Advantage ETF (GLBL) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GLBL returned +15.83% while VTI returned +17.22%. Year to date, GLBL is up 12.45% versus a gain of 12.57% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GLBL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 13.0% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.8% for GLBL and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.97. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GLBL charges 0.65% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GLBL currently yields 0.76% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 85.3% of GLBL's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VTI, our book for it covers 90.6% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of GLBL is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
225 positions in common, counted across the 354 positions we hold weights for in GLBL and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 366 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GLBL | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 4.56% | 6.32% | 1.76% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 4.90% | 5.84% | 0.94% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 5.62% | 3.81% | 1.81% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 5.07% | 3.17% | 1.90% |
| GOOGLAlphabet A Usd 0.001 | 4.63% | 2.88% | 1.75% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.33% | 2.46% | 1.87% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 4.02% | 2.27% | 1.75% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 2.33% | 1.79% | 0.54% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc. | 1.94% | 1.30% | 0.64% |
| METAMeta Platforms, Inc. | 2.97% | 0.00% | 2.97% |
85.3% of GLBL is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GLBL or VTI?
GLBL has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $62 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GLBL or VTI?
Over the past year GLBL returned +15.83% vs +17.22% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GLBL annualized +19.07% vs +17.94% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GLBL or VTI?
GLBL has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 13.0% for VTI. Worst drawdown: GLBL -19.8% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both GLBL and VTI?
GLBL and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.97, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GLBL and VTI?
At least 85.3% of GLBL's money is in holdings VTI also owns. Our book for VTI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 225 positions in common, counted across the 354 positions we hold weights for in GLBL and 2,787 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, GLBL or VTI?
GLBL yields 0.76% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than GLBL?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. GLBL led over the full window, VTI over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.