GLBL vs IVV
Pacer MSCI World Industry Advantage ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, GLBL or IVV?
Nearly the same fund. IVV costs less.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. GLBL led over the full window, IVV over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GLBL | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1M | $886.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.78% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 366 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +13.13% | +13.39%Best |
| 1Y Return | +18.83% | +20.08%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.29% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.88% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.3% | 12.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -19.8% | -18.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 2 years | $14,314Best | $14,111 |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.4% | 37.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 16, 2024 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 17, 2024 to Sep 4, 2026 (2 years).
GLBL vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2 years both funds cover.
GLBL vs IVV Performance
Pacer MSCI World Industry Advantage ETF (GLBL) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year GLBL returned +18.83% while IVV returned +20.08%. Year to date, GLBL is up 13.13% versus a gain of 13.39% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GLBL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 12.6% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.8% for GLBL and -18.8% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GLBL charges 0.65% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GLBL currently yields 0.78% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
83.7% of GLBL's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 66.3% of IVV's money is in holdings GLBL also owns.
Most of GLBL is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
201 positions in common, counted across the 354 positions we hold weights for in GLBL and 505 in IVV, against full books of 366 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 297 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for GLBL (33.0% of the fund), and 38 for GLBL that do not appear in IVV (2.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GLBL | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 4.56% | 7.98% | 3.42% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 4.90% | 6.86% | 1.96% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 5.62% | 5.44% | 0.18% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 5.07% | 4.01% | 1.06% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc.Class A | 4.63% | 3.19% | 1.44% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.33% | 2.98% | 1.35% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 4.02% | 2.56% | 1.46% |
| METAMeta Platform Inc | 2.97% | 1.94% | 1.03% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 2.33% | 1.51% | 0.82% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.94% | 1.18% | 0.76% |
83.7% of GLBL is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GLBL or IVV?
GLBL has an expense ratio of 0.65% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $62 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GLBL or IVV?
Over the past year GLBL returned +18.83% vs +20.08% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GLBL annualized +19.64% vs +18.79% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GLBL or IVV?
GLBL has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 12.6% for IVV. Worst drawdown: GLBL -19.8% vs IVV -18.8%.
Should I hold both GLBL and IVV?
GLBL and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GLBL and IVV?
83.7% of GLBL's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 66.3% of IVV's is in holdings GLBL also owns. They hold 201 positions in common, counted across the 354 positions we hold weights for in GLBL and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, GLBL or IVV?
GLBL yields 0.78% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than GLBL?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. GLBL led over the full window, IVV over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.