GLBL vs IVV
GLBL vs IVV
Pacer MSCI World Industry Advantage ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GLBL | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.77% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 375 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +14.51% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.23% | +23.70% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.49% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.43% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -19.8% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 16, 2024 | May 15, 2000 |
GLBL vs IVV Performance
Pacer MSCI World Industry Advantage ETF (GLBL) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year GLBL returned +23.23% while IVV returned +23.70%. Year to date, GLBL is up 14.51% versus a gain of 13.80% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GLBL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.7% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.8% for GLBL and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GLBL charges 0.65% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GLBL currently yields 0.77% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
GLBL and IVV share 202 holdings out of 658 unique holdings combined, representing a 59.5% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GLBL | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPL | 5.08% | 7.44% | 2.36% |
| NVDA | 4.35% | 7.76% | 3.41% |
| MSFT | 4.63% | 4.57% | 0.06% |
| AMZN | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| GOOGL | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| AVGO | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| GOOG | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| META | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| MU | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| AMD | Pro | Pro | Pro |
See all 10 holdings GLBL shares with IVV Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position. Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime. | |||
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GLBL or IVV?
GLBL has an expense ratio of 0.65% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GLBL or IVV?
Over the past year GLBL returned +23.23% vs +23.70% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GLBL annualized +21.29% vs +7.05% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GLBL or IVV?
GLBL has been the more volatile fund at 15.7% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: GLBL -19.8% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both GLBL and IVV?
GLBL and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between GLBL and IVV?
GLBL and IVV share 202 common holdings with a 59.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 658 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GLBL or IVV?
GLBL yields 0.77% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.