GNOM vs VTI
Global X Genomics & Biotechnology ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. GNOM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GNOM | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $79M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.15% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 52 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +30.50% | +14.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +69.54% | +22.19% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.14% | +21.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -8.28% | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 29.8% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -75.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 5, 2019 | May 24, 2001 |
GNOM vs VTI Performance
Global X Genomics & Biotechnology ETF (GNOM) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GNOM returned +69.54% while VTI returned +22.19%. Year to date, GNOM is up 30.50% versus a gain of 14.22% for VTI.
Over three years, GNOM compounded at +10.14% per year against +21.27% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -8.28% and +12.23% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.14% annualized vs -0.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GNOM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.8% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -75.0% for GNOM and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GNOM charges 0.50% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GNOM currently yields 1.15% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
GNOM and VTI share 29 holdings out of 2789 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GNOM or VTI?
GNOM has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GNOM or VTI?
Over the past year GNOM returned +69.54% vs +22.19% for VTI, so GNOM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), GNOM annualized -0.22% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GNOM or VTI?
GNOM has been the more volatile fund at 29.8% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: GNOM -75.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both GNOM and VTI?
GNOM and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GNOM and VTI?
GNOM and VTI share 29 common holdings with a 2.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2789 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GNOM or VTI?
GNOM yields 1.15% while VTI yields 1.07%, so GNOM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.