GNOM vs VOO
Global X Genomics & Biotechnology ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. GNOM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GNOM | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $79M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.15% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 52 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +30.83% | +13.44% | |
| 1Y Return | +73.35% | +22.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.25% | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -8.20% | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 29.8% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -75.0% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 5, 2019 | Sep 7, 2010 |
GNOM vs VOO Performance
Global X Genomics & Biotechnology ETF (GNOM) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GNOM returned +73.35% while VOO returned +22.62%. Year to date, GNOM is up 30.83% versus a gain of 13.44% for VOO.
Over three years, GNOM compounded at +10.25% per year against +21.47% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are -8.20% and +13.27% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.55% annualized vs -0.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GNOM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.8% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -75.0% for GNOM and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GNOM charges 0.50% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GNOM currently yields 1.15% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
GNOM and VOO share 8 holdings out of 532 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GNOM or VOO?
GNOM has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GNOM or VOO?
Over the past year GNOM returned +73.35% vs +22.62% for VOO, so GNOM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), GNOM annualized -0.18% vs +13.55% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GNOM or VOO?
GNOM has been the more volatile fund at 29.8% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: GNOM -75.0% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both GNOM and VOO?
GNOM and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GNOM and VOO?
GNOM and VOO share 8 common holdings with a 2.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 532 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GNOM or VOO?
GNOM yields 1.15% while VOO yields 1.09%, so GNOM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.