GUT vs IVV
Gabelli Utility Trust (The) vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GUT | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 2.06% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $326M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 19.70% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 204 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +12.75% | +12.28% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.12% | +20.94% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.81% | +21.81% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.49% | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.8% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -57.6% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Gabelli Funds | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 9, 1999 | May 15, 2000 |
GUT vs IVV Performance
Gabelli Utility Trust (The) (GUT) is a ETF from Gabelli Funds and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year GUT returned +20.12% while IVV returned +20.94%. Year to date, GUT is up 12.75% versus a gain of 12.28% for IVV.
Over three years, GUT compounded at +8.81% per year against +21.81% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +4.49% and +13.05% respectively. Across the full 26-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +6.98% annualized vs +0.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GUT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.8% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -57.6% for GUT and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.42. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GUT charges 2.06% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $206 vs $3 annually, a gap of $203 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GUT currently yields 19.70% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
GUT and IVV share 49 holdings out of 649 unique holdings combined, representing a 4.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GUT or IVV?
GUT has an expense ratio of 2.06% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $203 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GUT or IVV?
Over the past year GUT returned +20.12% vs +20.94% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (26 years), GUT annualized +0.82% vs +6.98% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GUT or IVV?
GUT has been the more volatile fund at 19.8% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: GUT -57.6% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both GUT and IVV?
GUT and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.42, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GUT and IVV?
GUT and IVV share 49 common holdings with a 4.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 649 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GUT or IVV?
GUT yields 19.70% while IVV yields 1.10%, so GUT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.