GUT vs IVV
Gabelli Utility Trust (The) vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, GUT or IVV?
All Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. GUT led over 1Y, IVV over 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GUT | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 2.06% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $317M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 19.70% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 204 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +15.56%Best | +12.24% |
| 1Y Return | +21.05%Best | +18.61% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.10% | +20.98%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.19% | +12.76%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.0% | 15.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -57.6% | -56.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $12,879 | $18,230Best |
| Fund Family | Gabelli Funds | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | All Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 9, 1999 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 19, 2000 to Sep 9, 2026 (26.3 years).
GUT vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 26.3 years both funds cover.
GUT vs IVV Performance
Gabelli Utility Trust (The) (GUT) is an ETF from Gabelli Funds and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year GUT returned +21.05% while IVV returned +18.61%. Year to date, GUT is up 15.56% versus a gain of 12.24% for IVV.
Over three years, GUT compounded at +10.10% per year against +20.98% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +5.19% and +12.76% respectively. Across the full 26-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +6.97% annualized vs +1.26%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GUT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.0% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -57.6% for GUT and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.42. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GUT charges 2.06% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $206 vs $3 annually, a gap of $203 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GUT currently yields 19.70% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
At least 5.8% of IVV's money is in holdings GUT also owns.
Only one direction is shown: for GUT, our book for it lists positions totalling 112.8% of the fund, which is what a leveraged book looks like and is not a denominator we can divide by.
IVV and GUT share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 127 days apart, GUT as of Mar 31, 2026 and IVV as of Aug 5, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
49 positions in common, counted across the 193 positions we hold weights for in GUT and 505 in IVV, against full books of 204 and 508.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GUT | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NEENextera Energy Inc. | 5.28% | 0.27% | 5.01% |
| OKEOneok Inc. | 4.29% | 0.08% | 4.21% |
| WECWec Energy Group Inc. | 4.20% | 0.05% | 4.15% |
| XELXcel Energy Inc. | 3.56% | 0.07% | 3.49% |
| EVRGEvergy Inc. | 3.43% | 0.03% | 3.40% |
| DUKDuke Energy Corp. | 2.90% | 0.14% | 2.76% |
| ESEversource Energy | 2.49% | 0.04% | 2.45% |
| AEPAmerican Electric Power Co Inc | 2.09% | 0.10% | 1.99% |
| CMSCms Energy Corp. | 2.11% | 0.03% | 2.08% |
| LNTAlliant Energy Corp. | 1.92% | 0.03% | 1.89% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GUT and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GUT or IVV?
GUT has an expense ratio of 2.06% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $203 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GUT or IVV?
Over the past year GUT returned +21.05% vs +18.61% for IVV, so GUT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (26 years), GUT annualized +1.26% vs +6.97% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GUT or IVV?
GUT has been the more volatile fund at 20.0% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: GUT -57.6% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both GUT and IVV?
GUT and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.42, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GUT and IVV?
At least 5.8% of IVV's money is in holdings GUT also owns. Our book for GUT is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 49 positions in common, counted across the 193 positions we hold weights for in GUT and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, GUT or IVV?
GUT yields 19.70% while IVV yields 1.06%, so GUT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than GUT?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. GUT led over 1Y, IVV over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.