GUT vs VOO
Gabelli Utility Trust (The) vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, GUT or VOO?
All Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. GUT led over 1Y, VOO over 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GUT | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 2.06% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $317M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 19.70% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 204 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +15.56%Best | +12.23% |
| 1Y Return | +21.05%Best | +18.60% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.10% | +20.98%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.19% | +12.76%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.2% | 14.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -55.0% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $12,879 | $18,230Best |
| Fund Family | Gabelli Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | All Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 9, 1999 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 9, 2010 to Sep 9, 2026 (16 years).
GUT vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16 years both funds cover.
GUT vs VOO Performance
Gabelli Utility Trust (The) (GUT) is an ETF from Gabelli Funds and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GUT returned +21.05% while VOO returned +18.60%. Year to date, GUT is up 15.56% versus a gain of 12.23% for VOO.
Over three years, GUT compounded at +10.10% per year against +20.98% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +5.19% and +12.76% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.40% annualized vs +3.42%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GUT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.2% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -55.0% for GUT and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.44. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GUT charges 2.06% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $206 vs $3 annually, a gap of $203 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GUT currently yields 19.70% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
At least 5.8% of VOO's money is in holdings GUT also owns.
Only one direction is shown: for GUT, our book for it lists positions totalling 112.8% of the fund, which is what a leveraged book looks like and is not a denominator we can divide by.
VOO and GUT share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 91 days apart, GUT as of Mar 31, 2026 and VOO as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
49 positions in common, counted across the 193 positions we hold weights for in GUT and 505 in VOO, against full books of 204 and 509.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GUT | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NEENextera Energy Inc. | 5.28% | 0.28% | 5.00% |
| OKEOneok Inc. | 4.29% | 0.08% | 4.21% |
| WECWec Energy Group Inc. | 4.20% | 0.06% | 4.14% |
| XELXcel Energy Inc. | 3.56% | 0.08% | 3.48% |
| EVRGEvergy Inc. | 3.43% | 0.03% | 3.40% |
| DUKDuke Energy Corp. | 2.90% | 0.15% | 2.75% |
| ESEversource Energy | 2.49% | 0.04% | 2.45% |
| AEPAmerican Electric Power Co Inc | 2.09% | 0.12% | 1.97% |
| CMSCms Energy Corp. | 2.11% | 0.04% | 2.07% |
| LNTAlliant Energy Corp. | 1.92% | 0.03% | 1.89% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GUT and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GUT or VOO?
GUT has an expense ratio of 2.06% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $203 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GUT or VOO?
Over the past year GUT returned +21.05% vs +18.60% for VOO, so GUT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), GUT annualized +3.42% vs +13.40% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GUT or VOO?
GUT has been the more volatile fund at 18.2% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: GUT -55.0% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both GUT and VOO?
GUT and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.44, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GUT and VOO?
At least 5.8% of VOO's money is in holdings GUT also owns. Our book for GUT is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 49 positions in common, counted across the 193 positions we hold weights for in GUT and 505 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, GUT or VOO?
GUT yields 19.70% while VOO yields 1.04%, so GUT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than GUT?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. GUT led over 1Y, VOO over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.