GVIP vs IVV
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. GVIP delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GVIP | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $584M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.31% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 53 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +10.60% | +12.71% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.12% | +21.89% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +26.86% | +22.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.45% | +12.96% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.1% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -37.1% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Goldman Sachs Asset Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 1, 2016 | May 15, 2000 |
GVIP vs IVV Performance
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP) is a ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year GVIP returned +24.12% while IVV returned +21.89%. Year to date, GVIP is up 10.60% versus a gain of 12.71% for IVV.
Over three years, GVIP compounded at +26.86% per year against +22.08% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +11.45% and +12.96% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, GVIP has the edge at +16.76% annualized vs +7.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GVIP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.1% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -37.1% for GVIP and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GVIP charges 0.45% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $3 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GVIP currently yields 0.31% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
GVIP and IVV share 37 holdings out of 520 unique holdings combined, representing a 29.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GVIP or IVV?
GVIP has an expense ratio of 0.45% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $42 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GVIP or IVV?
Over the past year GVIP returned +24.12% vs +21.89% for IVV, so GVIP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), GVIP annualized +16.76% vs +7.00% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GVIP or IVV?
GVIP has been the more volatile fund at 19.1% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: GVIP -37.1% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both GVIP and IVV?
GVIP and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between GVIP and IVV?
GVIP and IVV share 37 common holdings with a 29.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 520 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GVIP or IVV?
GVIP yields 0.31% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.