GXPE vs IVV
Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, GXPE or IVV?
GXPE has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. GXPE led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 78.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GXPE | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1M | $882.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.94% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 48 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +41.18%Best | +14.70% |
| 1Y Return | +44.88%Best | +17.46% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.21% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.71% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.4% | 11.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -15.7% | -8.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.2 years | $15,008Best | $12,413 |
| Top 10 Weight | 78.5% | 38.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 22, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 23, 2025 to Oct 7, 2026 (1.2 years).
GXPE vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.2 years both funds cover.
GXPE vs IVV Performance
Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF (GXPE) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year GXPE returned +44.88% while IVV returned +17.46%. Year to date, GXPE is up 41.18% versus a gain of 14.70% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GXPE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.4% compared with 11.9% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.7% for GXPE and -8.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.43. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GXPE charges 0.15% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $3 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GXPE currently yields 1.94% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
96.3% of GXPE's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 3.5% of IVV's money is in holdings GXPE also owns.
Most of GXPE is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
20 positions in common, counted across the 22 positions we hold weights for in GXPE and 505 in IVV, against full books of 48 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 477 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for GXPE (95.7% of the fund), and 1 for GXPE that do not appear in IVV (2.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GXPE | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 28.48% | 1.04% | 27.44% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 16.32% | 0.61% | 15.71% |
| COPConocophillips Common Stock USD 0.01 | 6.93% | 0.25% | 6.68% |
| VLOValero Energy | 4.81% | 0.18% | 4.63% |
| MPCMarathon Petroleum Corp | 4.80% | 0.17% | 4.63% |
| PSXPhillips 66 | 4.30% | 0.16% | 4.14% |
| WMBWilliams Cos. Inc. | 3.69% | 0.13% | 3.56% |
| SLBSchlumberger Nv. | 3.47% | 0.13% | 3.34% |
| EOGEog Resources Inc | 3.23% | 0.12% | 3.11% |
| OKEOneok Inc. | 2.52% | 0.09% | 2.43% |
96.3% of GXPE is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GXPE or IVV?
GXPE has an expense ratio of 0.15% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $12 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GXPE or IVV?
Over the past year GXPE returned +44.88% vs +17.46% for IVV, so GXPE leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), GXPE annualized +40.26% vs +19.74% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GXPE or IVV?
GXPE has been the more volatile fund at 22.4% annualized versus 11.9% for IVV. Worst drawdown: GXPE -15.7% vs IVV -8.9%.
Should I hold both GXPE and IVV?
GXPE and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of -0.43, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GXPE and IVV?
96.3% of GXPE's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 3.5% of IVV's is in holdings GXPE also owns. They hold 20 positions in common, counted across the 22 positions we hold weights for in GXPE and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, GXPE or IVV?
GXPE yields 1.94% while IVV yields 1.06%, so GXPE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than GXPE?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. GXPE led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 78.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.