GXPT vs VTI
Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. GXPT delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GXPT | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $130M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.22% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 89 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +20.89% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +33.11% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 25.9% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -18.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 22, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
GXPT vs VTI Performance
Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GXPT returned +33.11% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, GXPT is up 20.89% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GXPT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 25.9% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.7% for GXPT and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GXPT charges 0.15% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $3 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GXPT currently yields 0.22% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
GXPT and VTI share 78 holdings out of 2795 unique holdings combined, representing a 32.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GXPT or VTI?
GXPT has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $12 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GXPT or VTI?
Over the past year GXPT returned +33.11% vs +22.35% for VTI, so GXPT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), GXPT annualized +30.95% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GXPT or VTI?
GXPT has been the more volatile fund at 25.9% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: GXPT -18.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both GXPT and VTI?
GXPT and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GXPT and VTI?
GXPT and VTI share 78 common holdings with a 32.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2795 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GXPT or VTI?
GXPT yields 0.22% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.