GXPT vs VYM
Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. GXPT delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GXPT | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $130M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.22% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 89 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +20.60% | +14.66% | |
| 1Y Return | +32.15% | +22.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.72% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.18% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 25.9% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -18.7% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 22, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
GXPT vs VYM Performance
Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GXPT returned +32.15% while VYM returned +22.16%. Year to date, GXPT is up 20.60% versus a gain of 14.66% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GXPT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 25.9% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.7% for GXPT and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.25. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GXPT charges 0.15% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $4 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GXPT currently yields 0.22% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
GXPT and VYM share 19 holdings out of 670 unique holdings combined, representing a 15.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GXPT or VYM?
GXPT has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $11 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GXPT or VYM?
Over the past year GXPT returned +32.15% vs +22.16% for VYM, so GXPT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), GXPT annualized +30.75% vs +7.01% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GXPT or VYM?
GXPT has been the more volatile fund at 25.9% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: GXPT -18.7% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both GXPT and VYM?
GXPT and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.25, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GXPT and VYM?
GXPT and VYM share 19 common holdings with a 15.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 670 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GXPT or VYM?
GXPT yields 0.22% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.