HFGM vs VXUS
Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HFGM | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.01% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $152M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 31 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +6.36% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.44% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.9% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.1% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Unlimited Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 14, 2025 | Jan 26, 2011 |
HFGM vs VXUS Performance
Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF (HFGM) is a ETF from Unlimited Funds and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year HFGM returned +21.44% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, HFGM is up 6.36% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
HFGM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.9% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.1% for HFGM and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HFGM charges 1.01% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $101 vs $5 annually, a gap of $96 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HFGM currently yields 0.00% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
HFGM and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7867 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HFGM or VXUS?
HFGM has an expense ratio of 1.01% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $96 per year of difference.
Which performed better, HFGM or VXUS?
Over the past year HFGM returned +21.44% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), HFGM annualized +26.51% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, HFGM or VXUS?
HFGM has been the more volatile fund at 16.9% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: HFGM -15.1% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both HFGM and VXUS?
HFGM and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between HFGM and VXUS?
HFGM and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7867 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, HFGM or VXUS?
HFGM yields 0.00% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.