HIBL vs VTI
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. HIBL delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HIBL | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.98% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $94M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.61% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +56.68% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +134.66% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +52.30% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.32% | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 88.7% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -88.4% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 7, 2019 | May 24, 2001 |
HIBL vs VTI Performance
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X ETF (HIBL) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year HIBL returned +134.66% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, HIBL is up 56.68% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, HIBL compounded at +52.30% per year against +21.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +13.32% and +12.01% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, HIBL has the edge at +18.31% annualized vs +8.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
HIBL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 88.7% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -88.4% for HIBL and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HIBL charges 0.98% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $98 vs $3 annually, a gap of $95 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HIBL currently yields 1.61% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
HIBL and VTI share 89 holdings out of 2801 unique holdings combined, representing a 17.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HIBL or VTI?
HIBL has an expense ratio of 0.98% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $95 per year of difference.
Which performed better, HIBL or VTI?
Over the past year HIBL returned +134.66% vs +22.35% for VTI, so HIBL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), HIBL annualized +18.31% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, HIBL or VTI?
HIBL has been the more volatile fund at 88.7% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: HIBL -88.4% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both HIBL and VTI?
HIBL and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between HIBL and VTI?
HIBL and VTI share 89 common holdings with a 17.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2801 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, HIBL or VTI?
HIBL yields 1.61% while VTI yields 1.07%, so HIBL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.