HIBL vs VTI
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, HIBL or VTI?
Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. HIBL led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window, VTI over 5Y. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HIBL | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.98% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $74M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.45% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 108 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +66.37%Best | +13.60% |
| 1Y Return | +105.91%Best | +18.17% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +65.15%Best | +23.04% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.46% | +12.14%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 88.1% | 17.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -88.4% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,203 | $17,734Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.2% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Leveraged Equity | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 7, 2019 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 7, 2019 to Sep 25, 2026 (6.9 years).
HIBL vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.9 years both funds cover.
HIBL vs VTI Performance
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X ETF (HIBL) is an ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year HIBL returned +105.91% while VTI returned +18.17%. Year to date, HIBL is up 66.37% versus a gain of 13.60% for VTI.
Over three years, HIBL compounded at +65.15% per year against +23.04% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +11.46% and +12.14% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, HIBL has the edge at +19.07% annualized vs +14.99%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
HIBL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 88.1% compared with 17.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -88.4% for HIBL and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HIBL charges 0.98% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $98 vs $3 annually, a gap of $95 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HIBL currently yields 1.45% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
60.8% of HIBL's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 31.8% of VTI's money is in holdings HIBL also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
96 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in HIBL and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 108 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,057 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for HIBL (65.9% of the fund), and 4 for HIBL that do not appear in VTI (37.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in HIBL | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 0.63% | 6.40% | 5.77% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 0.49% | 3.65% | 3.16% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 0.65% | 2.56% | 1.91% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 0.45% | 2.31% | 1.86% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.18% | 1.29% | 0.11% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 0.48% | 1.70% | 1.22% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.02% | 1.08% | 0.06% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 0.82% | 1.22% | 0.40% |
| SNDKSandisk Corp/De | 1.68% | 0.25% | 1.43% |
| LRCXLam Research Corp | 0.97% | 0.51% | 0.46% |
60.8% of HIBL is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HIBL or VTI?
HIBL has an expense ratio of 0.98% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $95 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, HIBL or VTI?
Over the past year HIBL returned +105.91% vs +18.17% for VTI, so HIBL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), HIBL annualized +19.07% vs +14.99% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, HIBL or VTI?
HIBL has been the more volatile fund at 88.1% annualized versus 17.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: HIBL -88.4% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both HIBL and VTI?
HIBL and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between HIBL and VTI?
60.8% of HIBL's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 31.8% of VTI's is in holdings HIBL also owns. They hold 96 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in HIBL and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, HIBL or VTI?
HIBL yields 1.45% while VTI yields 1.03%, so HIBL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than HIBL?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. HIBL led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window, VTI over 5Y. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.