HIBL vs VOO
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, HIBL or VOO?
Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. HIBL led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HIBL | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.98% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $80M | $1.0T |
| Dividend Yield | 1.45% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 216 | 506 |
| YTD Return | +74.07%Best | +14.36% |
| 1Y Return | +90.98%Best | +16.70% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +66.63%Best | +23.34% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.22%Best | +13.93% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 87.5% | 16.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -88.4% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $19,441Best | $19,195 |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Leveraged Equity | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 7, 2019 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 7, 2019 to Oct 5, 2026 (6.9 years).
HIBL vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.9 years both funds cover.
HIBL vs VOO Performance
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X ETF (HIBL) is an ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year HIBL returned +90.98% while VOO returned +16.70%. Year to date, HIBL is up 74.07% versus a gain of 14.36% for VOO.
Over three years, HIBL compounded at +66.63% per year against +23.34% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +14.22% and +13.93% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, HIBL has the edge at +19.77% annualized vs +15.62%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
HIBL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 87.5% compared with 16.7% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -88.4% for HIBL and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HIBL charges 0.98% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $98 vs $3 annually, a gap of $95 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HIBL currently yields 1.45% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
At least 36.2% of VOO's money is in holdings HIBL also owns.
Stated as a floor: for HIBL, our book for it covers 83.1% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, HIBL as of Sep 15, 2026 and VOO as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
96 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in HIBL and 494 in VOO, against full books of 216 and 506.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in HIBL | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 0.62% | 7.55% | 6.93% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 0.50% | 4.13% | 3.63% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 0.62% | 2.86% | 2.24% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 0.47% | 2.62% | 2.15% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.19% | 1.44% | 0.25% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 0.56% | 1.90% | 1.34% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.12% | 1.21% | 0.09% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 0.84% | 1.36% | 0.52% |
| SNDKSandisk Corp/De | 1.72% | 0.28% | 1.44% |
| INTCIntel Corporation | 0.93% | 0.66% | 0.27% |
36.2% of VOO is already inside HIBL.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HIBL or VOO?
HIBL has an expense ratio of 0.98% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $95 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, HIBL or VOO?
Over the past year HIBL returned +90.98% vs +16.70% for VOO, so HIBL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), HIBL annualized +19.77% vs +15.62% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, HIBL or VOO?
HIBL has been the more volatile fund at 87.5% annualized versus 16.7% for VOO. Worst drawdown: HIBL -88.4% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both HIBL and VOO?
HIBL and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between HIBL and VOO?
At least 36.2% of VOO's money is in holdings HIBL also owns. Our book for HIBL is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 96 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in HIBL and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, HIBL or VOO?
HIBL yields 1.45% while VOO yields 1.04%, so HIBL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than HIBL?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. HIBL led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.