HIDV vs VTI
AB US High Dividend ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, HIDV or VTI?
Nearly the same fund. VTI costs less.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. HIDV led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 34.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HIDV | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $204M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.23% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 107 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +13.65% | +14.00%Best |
| 1Y Return | +17.41%Best | +16.88% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.18% | +22.75%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.68% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.4%Best | 12.8% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8%Best | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 3.5 years | $20,155 | $20,363Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 34.3% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | AllianceBernstein L.P. | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 22, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 22, 2023 to Sep 21, 2026 (3.5 years).
HIDV vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.5 years both funds cover.
HIDV vs VTI Performance
AB US High Dividend ETF (HIDV) is an ETF from AllianceBernstein L.P. and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year HIDV returned +17.41% while VTI returned +16.88%. Year to date, HIDV is up 13.65% versus a gain of 14.00% for VTI.
Over three years, HIDV compounded at +22.18% per year against +22.75% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +22.53% annualized vs +22.17%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.8% compared with 12.4% for HIDV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for HIDV and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HIDV charges 0.35% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HIDV currently yields 2.23% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
93.5% of HIDV's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 49.9% of VTI's money is in holdings HIDV also owns.
Most of HIDV is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
95 positions in common, counted across the 105 positions we hold weights for in HIDV and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 107 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,061 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for HIDV (47.6% of the fund), and 4 for HIDV that do not appear in VTI (2.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in HIDV | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 7.91% | 6.40% | 1.51% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.50% | 6.29% | 0.21% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.99% | 4.79% | 0.20% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.10% | 3.65% | 0.55% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 3.04% | 2.90% | 0.14% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.94% | 2.56% | 0.62% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 1.64% | 2.31% | 0.67% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 2.43% | 1.29% | 1.14% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.20% | 1.70% | 0.50% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.43% | 0.57% | 0.86% |
93.5% of HIDV is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HIDV or VTI?
HIDV has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, HIDV or VTI?
Over the past year HIDV returned +17.41% vs +16.88% for VTI, so HIDV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), HIDV annualized +22.17% vs +22.53% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, HIDV or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 12.8% annualized versus 12.4% for HIDV. Worst drawdown: HIDV -18.8% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both HIDV and VTI?
HIDV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between HIDV and VTI?
93.5% of HIDV's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 49.9% of VTI's is in holdings HIDV also owns. They hold 95 positions in common, counted across the 105 positions we hold weights for in HIDV and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, HIDV or VTI?
HIDV yields 2.23% while VTI yields 1.03%, so HIDV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than HIDV?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. HIDV led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 34.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.