HQDG vs VYM
Raub Brock Dividend Growth ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, HQDG or VYM?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HQDG | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $74M | $95.8B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.23% |
| Holdings | 49 | 610 |
| YTD Return | +4.04% | +16.00%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +18.97% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.46% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.54% |
| Top 10 Weight | 47.9% | 25.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Raub Brock Capital Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Sep 3, 2026 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
HQDG vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
HQDG vs VYM Performance
Raub Brock Dividend Growth ETF (HQDG) is an ETF from Raub Brock Capital Management and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, HQDG is up 4.04% versus a gain of 16.00% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HQDG charges 0.50% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $4 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HQDG currently yields 0.00% against 2.23% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
30.7% of HQDG's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 11.8% of VYM's money is in holdings HQDG also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
7 positions in common, counted across the 23 positions we hold weights for in HQDG and 602 in VYM, against full books of 49 and 610.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 570 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for HQDG (86.8% of the fund), and 15 for HQDG that do not appear in VYM (65.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in HQDG | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.37% | 6.94% | 2.57% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 4.80% | 1.83% | 2.97% |
| TXNTexas Instrument Inc | 4.65% | 0.96% | 3.69% |
| ORCLOracle Corp - Common | 3.99% | 1.03% | 2.96% |
| ETNEaton Corporation Plc Ordinary Shares | 4.19% | 0.63% | 3.56% |
| CARRCarrier Global Corporation | 4.39% | 0.18% | 4.21% |
| NDAQNasdaq Inc | 4.30% | 0.18% | 4.12% |
30.7% of HQDG is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HQDG or VYM?
HQDG has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between HQDG and VYM?
30.7% of HQDG's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 11.8% of VYM's is in holdings HQDG also owns. They hold 7 positions in common, counted across the 23 positions we hold weights for in HQDG and 602 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, HQDG or VYM?
HQDG yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.23%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than HQDG?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.