IBBQ vs IVV
Invesco Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IBBQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IBBQ | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.19% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $80M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.79% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 260 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +26.47% | +12.28% | |
| 1Y Return | +54.23% | +20.94% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.53% | +21.81% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.55% | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.6% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -37.9% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 11, 2021 | May 15, 2000 |
IBBQ vs IVV Performance
Invesco Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF (IBBQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year IBBQ returned +54.23% while IVV returned +20.94%. Year to date, IBBQ is up 26.47% versus a gain of 12.28% for IVV.
Over three years, IBBQ compounded at +21.53% per year against +21.81% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +7.55% and +13.05% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, IBBQ has the edge at +7.64% annualized vs +6.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IBBQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.6% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -37.9% for IBBQ and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.54. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IBBQ charges 0.19% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $19 vs $3 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IBBQ currently yields 0.79% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
IBBQ and IVV share 9 holdings out of 748 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IBBQ or IVV?
IBBQ has an expense ratio of 0.19% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $16 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IBBQ or IVV?
Over the past year IBBQ returned +54.23% vs +20.94% for IVV, so IBBQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), IBBQ annualized +7.64% vs +6.98% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IBBQ or IVV?
IBBQ has been the more volatile fund at 17.6% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IBBQ -37.9% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both IBBQ and IVV?
IBBQ and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.54, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IBBQ and IVV?
IBBQ and IVV share 9 common holdings with a 1.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 748 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IBBQ or IVV?
IBBQ yields 0.79% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.