ICF vs VOO

Quick Verdict

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: VOOMore Diversified: VOO

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricICFVOOWinner
Expense Ratio0.32%0.03%
AUM$2.1B$979.0B
Dividend Yield2.46%1.09%
Holdings34509
YTD Return+15.58%+13.80%
1Y Return+16.05%+23.71%
3Y Return (annualized)+10.45%+21.50%
5Y Return (annualized)+2.54%+13.44%
Volatility (annualized)21.3%14.1%
Max Drawdown-78.8%-34.3%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionJan 29, 2001Sep 7, 2010

ICF vs VOO Performance

iShares Select US REIT ETF (ICF) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ICF returned +16.05% while VOO returned +23.71%. Year to date, ICF is up 15.58% versus a gain of 13.80% for VOO.

Over three years, ICF compounded at +10.45% per year against +21.50% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +2.54% and +13.44% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.58% annualized vs +5.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

ICF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.3% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -78.8% for ICF and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ICF charges 0.32% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $32 vs $3 annually, a gap of $29 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ICF currently yields 2.46% against 1.09% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

1.7%overlap

ICF and VOO share 25 holdings out of 511 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.7% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ICFWeight in VOODifference
WELL8.50%0.25%8.25%
PLD7.86%0.20%7.66%
EQIX7.29%0.16%7.13%
AMTProProPro
SPGProProPro
PSAProProPro
OProProPro
VTRProProPro
DLRProProPro
IRMProProPro
See all 10 holdings ICF shares with VOO
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ICF or VOO?

ICF has an expense ratio of 0.32% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $29 per year of difference.

Which performed better, ICF or VOO?

Over the past year ICF returned +16.05% vs +23.71% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), ICF annualized +5.51% vs +13.58% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, ICF or VOO?

ICF has been the more volatile fund at 21.3% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: ICF -78.8% vs VOO -34.3%.

Should I hold both ICF and VOO?

ICF and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between ICF and VOO?

ICF and VOO share 25 common holdings with a 1.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 511 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, ICF or VOO?

ICF yields 2.46% while VOO yields 1.09%, so ICF currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →