IDNA vs VTI
iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. IDNA delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IDNA | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.47% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $215M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.86% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 62 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +50.48% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +76.24% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.07% | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -4.35% | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 26.1% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -68.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 11, 2019 | May 24, 2001 |
IDNA vs VTI Performance
iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare ETF (IDNA) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IDNA returned +76.24% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, IDNA is up 50.48% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Over three years, IDNA compounded at +23.07% per year against +21.54% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -4.35% and +12.11% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.07% annualized vs +7.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IDNA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.1% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -68.3% for IDNA and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.60. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IDNA charges 0.47% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $47 vs $3 annually, a gap of $44 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IDNA currently yields 0.86% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
IDNA and VTI share 25 holdings out of 2812 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IDNA or VTI?
IDNA has an expense ratio of 0.47% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $44 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IDNA or VTI?
Over the past year IDNA returned +76.24% vs +21.39% for VTI, so IDNA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), IDNA annualized +7.26% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IDNA or VTI?
IDNA has been the more volatile fund at 26.1% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: IDNA -68.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both IDNA and VTI?
IDNA and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.60, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IDNA and VTI?
IDNA and VTI share 25 common holdings with a 0.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2812 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IDNA or VTI?
IDNA yields 0.86% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.