IDRV vs VTI
iShares Self-Driving EV and Tech ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IDRV | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.48% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $138M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.76% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 74 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -2.01% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +9.86% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +1.22% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -3.39% | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 28.0% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -53.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 16, 2019 | May 24, 2001 |
IDRV vs VTI Performance
iShares Self-Driving EV and Tech ETF (IDRV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IDRV returned +9.86% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, IDRV is down 2.01% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, IDRV compounded at +1.22% per year against +21.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -3.39% and +12.01% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.09% annualized vs +6.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IDRV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 28.0% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.0% for IDRV and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IDRV charges 0.48% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $48 vs $3 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IDRV currently yields 1.76% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
IDRV and VTI share 13 holdings out of 2828 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IDRV or VTI?
IDRV has an expense ratio of 0.48% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $45 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IDRV or VTI?
Over the past year IDRV returned +9.86% vs +22.35% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), IDRV annualized +6.66% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IDRV or VTI?
IDRV has been the more volatile fund at 28.0% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: IDRV -53.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both IDRV and VTI?
IDRV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IDRV and VTI?
IDRV and VTI share 13 common holdings with a 1.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2828 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IDRV or VTI?
IDRV yields 1.76% while VTI yields 1.07%, so IDRV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.