INCE vs SPGM
Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF vs State Street SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
SPGM has a lower expense ratio. SPGM delivered stronger 1-year returns. SPGM offers more diversification with 2,985 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | INCE | SPGM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.29% | 0.09% | |
| AUM | $282M | $1.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.86% | 1.81% | |
| Holdings | 97 | 2,985 | |
| YTD Return | +17.19% | +15.41% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.14% | +25.49% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.29% | +21.81% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.82% | +11.66% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.8% | 13.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.1% | -34.0% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | SPDR State Street Global Advisors | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 20, 2016 | Feb 27, 2012 |
INCE vs SPGM Performance
Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and State Street SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM) is a ETF from SPDR State Street Global Advisors. Over the past year INCE returned +25.14% while SPGM returned +25.49%. Year to date, INCE is up 17.19% versus a gain of 15.41% for SPGM.
Over three years, INCE compounded at +17.29% per year against +21.81% for SPGM; over five years the annualized figures are +10.82% and +11.66% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, INCE has the edge at +12.63% annualized vs +9.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
INCE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.8% compared with 13.7% for SPGM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.1% for INCE and -34.0% for SPGM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
INCE charges 0.29% per year while SPGM charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $9 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, INCE currently yields 4.86% against 1.81% for SPGM.
Holdings Overlap
INCE and SPGM share 45 holdings out of 2860 unique holdings combined, representing a 10.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, INCE or SPGM?
INCE has an expense ratio of 0.29% while SPGM charges 0.09%. SPGM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $20 per year of difference.
Which performed better, INCE or SPGM?
Over the past year INCE returned +25.14% vs +25.49% for SPGM, so SPGM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), INCE annualized +12.63% vs +9.95% for SPGM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, INCE or SPGM?
INCE has been the more volatile fund at 13.8% annualized versus 13.7% for SPGM. Worst drawdown: INCE -34.1% vs SPGM -34.0%.
Should I hold both INCE and SPGM?
INCE and SPGM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between INCE and SPGM?
INCE and SPGM share 45 common holdings with a 10.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2860 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, INCE or SPGM?
INCE yields 4.86% while SPGM yields 1.81%, so INCE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.