ITAN vs IVV
Sparkline Intangible Value ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ITAN delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ITAN | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $106M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.05% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 160 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +21.70% | +14.50% | |
| 1Y Return | +36.67% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.79% | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.98% | +13.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.6% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -30.4% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Sparkline Capital | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 29, 2021 | May 15, 2000 |
ITAN vs IVV Performance
Sparkline Intangible Value ETF (ITAN) is a ETF from Sparkline Capital and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ITAN returned +36.67% while IVV returned +22.02%. Year to date, ITAN is up 21.70% versus a gain of 14.50% for IVV.
Over three years, ITAN compounded at +23.79% per year against +21.80% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +12.98% and +13.37% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, ITAN has the edge at +13.18% annualized vs +7.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ITAN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.6% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -30.4% for ITAN and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ITAN charges 0.50% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ITAN currently yields 1.05% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
ITAN and IVV share 98 holdings out of 564 unique holdings combined, representing a 16.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ITAN or IVV?
ITAN has an expense ratio of 0.50% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ITAN or IVV?
Over the past year ITAN returned +36.67% vs +22.02% for IVV, so ITAN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), ITAN annualized +13.18% vs +7.07% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ITAN or IVV?
ITAN has been the more volatile fund at 17.6% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: ITAN -30.4% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both ITAN and IVV?
ITAN and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between ITAN and IVV?
ITAN and IVV share 98 common holdings with a 16.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 564 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ITAN or IVV?
ITAN yields 1.05% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.