ITAN vs IVV
Sparkline Intangible Value ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, ITAN or IVV?
Nearly the same fund. IVV costs less.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ITAN led over 1Y and 3Y, IVV over 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. ITAN is less concentrated, with 22.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ITAN | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $115M | $882.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.98% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 157 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +18.93%Best | +13.60% |
| 1Y Return | +26.69%Best | +16.32% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.44%Best | +23.81% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.35% | +14.03%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.4% | 15.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -30.4% | -24.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,711 | $19,279Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 22.1%Best | 38.1% |
| Fund Family | Sparkline Capital | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 29, 2021 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 29, 2021 to Oct 2, 2026 (5.3 years).
ITAN vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.3 years both funds cover.
ITAN vs IVV Performance
Sparkline Intangible Value ETF (ITAN) is an ETF from Sparkline Capital and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ITAN returned +26.69% while IVV returned +16.32%. Year to date, ITAN is up 18.93% versus a gain of 13.60% for IVV.
Over three years, ITAN compounded at +25.44% per year against +23.81% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +13.35% and +14.03% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ITAN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.4% compared with 15.4% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -30.4% for ITAN and -24.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ITAN charges 0.50% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ITAN currently yields 0.98% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
75.8% of ITAN's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 18.9% of IVV's money is in holdings ITAN also owns.
Most of ITAN is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
92 positions in common, counted across the 154 positions we hold weights for in ITAN and 505 in IVV, against full books of 157 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 406 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for ITAN (80.4% of the fund), and 57 for ITAN that do not appear in IVV (21.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ITAN | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 5.21% | 3.80% | 1.41% |
| INTCIntel Corporation | 3.17% | 0.77% | 2.40% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 0.54% | 3.00% | 2.46% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 0.54% | 2.40% | 1.86% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.98% | 0.67% | 1.31% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 1.80% | 0.54% | 1.26% |
| IBMInternational Business Machines Corp. | 1.91% | 0.35% | 1.56% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 1.86% | 0.29% | 1.57% |
| CRMSalesforce Inc Crm Us Equity | 1.72% | 0.31% | 1.41% |
| TAT&T Inc | 1.53% | 0.27% | 1.26% |
75.8% of ITAN is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ITAN or IVV?
ITAN has an expense ratio of 0.50% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ITAN or IVV?
Over the past year ITAN returned +26.69% vs +16.32% for IVV, so ITAN leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ITAN or IVV?
ITAN has been the more volatile fund at 17.4% annualized versus 15.4% for IVV. Worst drawdown: ITAN -30.4% vs IVV -24.5%.
Should I hold both ITAN and IVV?
ITAN and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ITAN and IVV?
75.8% of ITAN's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 18.9% of IVV's is in holdings ITAN also owns. They hold 92 positions in common, counted across the 154 positions we hold weights for in ITAN and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, ITAN or IVV?
ITAN yields 0.98% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than ITAN?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ITAN led over 1Y and 3Y, IVV over 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. ITAN is less concentrated, with 22.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.