ITOL vs QQQ

ITOL vs QQQ

Which is better, ITOL or QQQ?

QQQ costs less.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. ITOL is less concentrated, with 34.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.2%.

Lower Fees: QQQLess Concentrated: ITOL

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricITOLQQQ
Expense Ratio0.60%0.18%Best
AUM$529,205.15$498.6B
Dividend Yield0.04%0.42%
Holdings41321
Top 10 Weight34.9%Best47.2%
Fund FamilyTema Global LimitedInvesco (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
InceptionSep 10, 2025Mar 10, 1999

Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

The two price series end 140 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. ITOL has data through May 14, 2026 and QQQ through Oct 1, 2026.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ITOL charges 0.60% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $18 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ITOL currently yields 0.04% against 0.42% for QQQ.

Holdings Overlap

ITOL already in QQQ10.9%
QQQ already in ITOL1.3%

10.9% of ITOL's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 1.3% of QQQ's money is in holdings ITOL also owns.

ITOL and QQQ share little of their money.

The two holdings books were reported 258 days apart, ITOL as of Dec 31, 2025 and QQQ as of Sep 15, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.

4 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in ITOL and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 41 and 321.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 93 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for ITOL (96.7% of the fund), and 4 for ITOL that do not appear in QQQ (9.1%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ITOLWeight in QQQDifference
NXPINxp Semiconductors Nv Sedol B505Pn73.07%0.26%2.81%
FER:ASFerrovial Se3.09%0.18%2.91%
INTUIntuit, Inc.2.44%0.39%2.05%
MELIMercadolibre Inc2.34%0.42%1.92%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of ITOL and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

ITOLQQQ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ITOL or QQQ?

ITOL has an expense ratio of 0.60% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $42 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between ITOL and QQQ?

10.9% of ITOL's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 1.3% of QQQ's is in holdings ITOL also owns. They hold 4 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in ITOL and 102 in QQQ.

Which pays a higher dividend, ITOL or QQQ?

ITOL yields 0.04% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is QQQ better than ITOL?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. ITOL is less concentrated, with 34.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.