IVV vs IYG
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs iShares US Financial Services ETF
Which is better, IVV or IYG?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 5Y and the full window, IYG over 3Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | IYG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.38% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $2.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 1.01% |
| Holdings | 508 | 104 |
| YTD Return | +11.57%Best | +3.93% |
| 1Y Return | +17.57%Best | +9.49% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.71% | +22.92%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.80%Best | +10.64% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1%Best | 21.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5%Best | -82.9% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,262Best | $16,579 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9%Best | 63.0% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 12, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 21, 2000 to Sep 10, 2026 (26.2 years).
IVV vs IYG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 26.2 years both funds cover.
IVV vs IYG Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares US Financial Services ETF (IYG) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% while IYG returned +9.49%. Year to date, IVV is up 11.57% versus a gain of 3.93% for IYG.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +20.71% per year against +22.92% for IYG; over five years the annualized figures are +12.80% and +10.64% respectively. Across the full 26-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +6.76% annualized vs +5.27%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IYG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.6% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -82.9% for IYG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while IYG charges 0.38%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $38 annually, a gap of $35 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 1.01% for IYG.
Holdings Overlap
10.5% of IVV's money is in holdings IYG also owns. 93.2% of IYG's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
Most of IYG is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
47 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 100 in IYG, against full books of 508 and 104.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 51 positions for IYG that do not appear in our book for IVV (6.6% of the fund), and 448 for IVV that do not appear in IYG (88.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in IYG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| JPMJpmorgan Chase & Co. | 1.45% | 12.98% | 11.53% |
| BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway B | 1.43% | 12.85% | 11.42% |
| VVisa Inc | 0.92% | 8.31% | 7.39% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 0.69% | 6.25% | 5.56% |
| BACBank Of America Corp. | 0.62% | 5.57% | 4.95% |
| GSGoldman Sachs Group Inc. | 0.47% | 4.21% | 3.74% |
| WFCWells Fargo & Co. | 0.41% | 3.67% | 3.26% |
| MSMorgan Stanley | 0.39% | 3.53% | 3.14% |
| CCitigroup Inc. | 0.35% | 3.16% | 2.81% |
| AXPAmerican Express Co. | 0.28% | 2.50% | 2.22% |
93.2% of IYG is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or IYG?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while IYG charges 0.38%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $35 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or IYG?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% vs +9.49% for IYG, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (26 years), IVV annualized +6.76% vs +5.27% for IYG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or IYG?
IYG has been the more volatile fund at 21.6% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs IYG -82.9%.
Should I hold both IVV and IYG?
IVV and IYG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and IYG?
93.2% of IYG's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 93.2% of IYG's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 47 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 100 in IYG.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or IYG?
IVV yields 1.06% while IYG yields 1.01%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IYG better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 5Y and the full window, IYG over 3Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.