IVV vs JDVL
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs John Hancock Disciplined Value Select ETF
Which is better, IVV or JDVL?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. JDVL led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | JDVL |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.56% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $898M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 1.43% |
| Holdings | 508 | 41 |
| YTD Return | +11.57% | +16.48%Best |
| 1Y Return | +17.57% | +23.76%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.71% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.80% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.0% | 12.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -8.9%Best | -9.2% |
| $10,000 over 1.1 years | $12,131 | $12,966Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9%Best | 38.9% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | John Hancock Investment Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Aug 6, 2025 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 6, 2025 to Sep 10, 2026 (1.1 years).
IVV vs JDVL growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.1 years both funds cover.
IVV vs JDVL Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and John Hancock Disciplined Value Select ETF (JDVL) is an ETF from John Hancock Investment Management. Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% while JDVL returned +23.76%. Year to date, IVV is up 11.57% versus a gain of 16.48% for JDVL.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.0% compared with 12.2% for JDVL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.9% for IVV and -9.2% for JDVL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while JDVL charges 0.56%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $56 annually, a gap of $53 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 1.43% for JDVL.
Holdings Overlap
29.1% of IVV's money is in holdings JDVL also owns. 87.8% of JDVL's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
Most of JDVL is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
35 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 39 in JDVL, against full books of 508 and 41.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1 positions for JDVL that do not appear in our book for IVV (4.3% of the fund), and 460 for IVV that do not appear in JDVL (70.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in JDVL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.01% | 7.58% | 3.57% |
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 7.98% | 2.73% | 5.25% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 5.44% | 5.22% | 0.22% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase & Co. | 1.45% | 4.27% | 2.82% |
| METAMeta Platforms, Inc. | 1.94% | 2.72% | 0.78% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.51% | 2.31% | 0.80% |
| PMPhilip Morris International Inc. | 0.44% | 3.23% | 2.79% |
| VVisa Inc | 0.92% | 2.70% | 1.78% |
| MSMorgan Stanley | 0.39% | 2.97% | 2.58% |
| WFCWells Fargo & Co. | 0.41% | 2.84% | 2.43% |
87.8% of JDVL is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or JDVL?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while JDVL charges 0.56%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $53 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or JDVL?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% vs +23.76% for JDVL, so JDVL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +19.20% vs +26.63% for JDVL. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or JDVL?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 13.0% annualized versus 12.2% for JDVL. Worst drawdown: IVV -8.9% vs JDVL -9.2%.
Should I hold both IVV and JDVL?
IVV and JDVL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and JDVL?
87.8% of JDVL's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 87.8% of JDVL's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 35 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 39 in JDVL.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or JDVL?
IVV yields 1.06% while JDVL yields 1.43%, so JDVL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is JDVL better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. JDVL led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.