IVV vs JPUS
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF
Which is better, IVV or JPUS?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. JPUS is less concentrated, with 4.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | JPUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.18% |
| AUM | $886.7B | $470M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 1.97% |
| Holdings | 508 | 375 |
| YTD Return | +13.39% | +15.99%Best |
| 1Y Return | +20.08%Best | +18.95% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.29%Best | +16.31% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.88%Best | +9.87% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.2% | 15.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9%Best | -38.7% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,327Best | $16,010 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9% | 4.6%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 29, 2015 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 30, 2015 to Sep 4, 2026 (10.9 years).
IVV vs JPUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 10.9 years both funds cover.
IVV vs JPUS Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS) is an ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Over the past year IVV returned +20.08% while JPUS returned +18.95%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.39% versus a gain of 15.99% for JPUS.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.29% per year against +16.31% for JPUS; over five years the annualized figures are +12.88% and +9.87% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +14.36% annualized vs +11.21%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.2% compared with 15.1% for JPUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for IVV and -38.7% for JPUS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while JPUS charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $18 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 1.97% for JPUS.
Holdings Overlap
50.2% of IVV's money is in holdings JPUS also owns. 64.8% of JPUS's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
222 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 369 in JPUS, against full books of 508 and 375.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 133 positions for JPUS that do not appear in our book for IVV (32.2% of the fund), and 277 for IVV that do not appear in JPUS (49.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in JPUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 7.98% | 0.42% | 7.56% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.86% | 0.42% | 6.44% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.98% | 0.44% | 2.54% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc.Class A | 3.19% | 0.21% | 2.98% |
| BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Brk/B Us Equity | 1.43% | 0.36% | 1.07% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 0.94% | 0.40% | 0.54% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 0.93% | 0.39% | 0.54% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 0.72% | 0.39% | 0.33% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 0.65% | 0.36% | 0.29% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 0.64% | 0.36% | 0.28% |
64.8% of JPUS is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or JPUS?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while JPUS charges 0.18%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $15 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or JPUS?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.08% vs +18.95% for JPUS, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), IVV annualized +14.36% vs +11.21% for JPUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or JPUS?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.2% annualized versus 15.1% for JPUS. Worst drawdown: IVV -33.9% vs JPUS -38.7%.
Should I hold both IVV and JPUS?
IVV and JPUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and JPUS?
64.8% of JPUS's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 64.8% of JPUS's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 222 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 369 in JPUS.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or JPUS?
IVV yields 1.10% while JPUS yields 1.97%, so JPUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is JPUS better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. JPUS is less concentrated, with 4.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.