IVV vs JPUS
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. JPUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | JPUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $459M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 2.25% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 377 | |
| YTD Return | +13.72% | +16.98% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.64% | +22.77% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.55% | +15.98% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.27% | +10.14% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -38.7% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 29, 2015 |
IVV vs JPUS Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS) is a ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Over the past year IVV returned +21.64% while JPUS returned +22.77%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.72% versus a gain of 16.98% for JPUS.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.55% per year against +15.98% for JPUS; over five years the annualized figures are +13.27% and +10.14% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, JPUS has the edge at +11.36% annualized vs +7.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
JPUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -38.7% for JPUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while JPUS charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $18 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 2.25% for JPUS.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and JPUS share 221 holdings out of 655 unique holdings combined, representing a 25.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or JPUS?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while JPUS charges 0.18%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $15 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or JPUS?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.64% vs +22.77% for JPUS, so JPUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs +11.36% for JPUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or JPUS?
JPUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs JPUS -38.7%.
Should I hold both IVV and JPUS?
IVV and JPUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and JPUS?
IVV and JPUS share 221 common holdings with a 25.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 655 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or JPUS?
IVV yields 1.09% while JPUS yields 2.25%, so JPUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.