IVV vs LEGR
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. LEGR delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | LEGR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.65% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $131M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 1.79% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 112 | |
| YTD Return | +12.71% | +11.97% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.89% | +24.80% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.08% | +24.10% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.96% | +11.83% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 17.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -36.1% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jan 25, 2018 |
IVV vs LEGR Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF (LEGR) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% while LEGR returned +24.80%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.71% versus a gain of 11.97% for LEGR.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.08% per year against +24.10% for LEGR; over five years the annualized figures are +12.96% and +11.83% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, LEGR has the edge at +11.42% annualized vs +7.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LEGR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.0% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -36.1% for LEGR. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while LEGR charges 0.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $65 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 1.79% for LEGR.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and LEGR share 39 holdings out of 571 unique holdings combined, representing a 18.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or LEGR?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while LEGR charges 0.65%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or LEGR?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% vs +24.80% for LEGR, so LEGR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), IVV annualized +7.00% vs +11.42% for LEGR. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or LEGR?
LEGR has been the more volatile fund at 17.0% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs LEGR -36.1%.
Should I hold both IVV and LEGR?
IVV and LEGR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and LEGR?
IVV and LEGR share 39 common holdings with a 18.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 571 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or LEGR?
IVV yields 1.10% while LEGR yields 1.79%, so LEGR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.