IVV vs METV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | METV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.58% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $213M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 42 | |
| YTD Return | +14.50% | +0.36% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.02% | -0.65% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.80% | +24.66% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.37% | +5.61% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 26.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -59.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Roundhill Investments | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 30, 2021 |
IVV vs METV Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) is a ETF from Roundhill Investments. Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% while METV returned -0.65%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.50% versus a gain of 0.36% for METV.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.80% per year against +24.66% for METV; over five years the annualized figures are +13.37% and +5.61% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.07% annualized vs +4.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
METV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.9% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -59.6% for METV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while METV charges 0.58%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $58 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.00% for METV.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and METV share 17 holdings out of 528 unique holdings combined, representing a 25.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or METV?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while METV charges 0.58%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $55 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or METV?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% vs -0.65% for METV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), IVV annualized +7.07% vs +4.95% for METV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or METV?
METV has been the more volatile fund at 26.9% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs METV -59.6%.
Should I hold both IVV and METV?
IVV and METV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and METV?
IVV and METV share 17 common holdings with a 25.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 528 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or METV?
IVV yields 1.09% while METV yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.