IVV vs METV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF
Which is better, IVV or METV?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 5Y and the full window, METV over 3Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 53.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | METV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.59% |
| AUM | $886.7B | $223M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.18% |
| Holdings | 508 | 43 |
| YTD Return | +13.39%Best | +6.19% |
| 1Y Return | +20.08%Best | +5.72% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.29% | +26.74%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.88%Best | +5.87% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.6%Best | 27.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -24.5%Best | -59.6% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,327Best | $13,300 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9%Best | 53.8% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Roundhill Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 30, 2021 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 30, 2021 to Sep 4, 2026 (5.2 years).
IVV vs METV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.2 years both funds cover.
IVV vs METV Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) is an ETF from Roundhill Investments. Over the past year IVV returned +20.08% while METV returned +5.72%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.39% versus a gain of 6.19% for METV.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.29% per year against +26.74% for METV; over five years the annualized figures are +12.88% and +5.87% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
METV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 27.0% compared with 15.6% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.5% for IVV and -59.6% for METV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while METV charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $59 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.18% for METV.
Holdings Overlap
32.3% of IVV's money is in holdings METV also owns. 44.8% of METV's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
17 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 39 in METV, against full books of 508 and 43.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 8 positions for METV that do not appear in our book for IVV (17.3% of the fund), and 480 for IVV that do not appear in METV (67.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in METV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.86% | 6.90% | 0.04% |
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 7.98% | 4.72% | 3.26% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 5.44% | 4.67% | 0.77% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc.Class A | 3.19% | 3.89% | 0.70% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.01% | 2.76% | 1.25% |
| METAMeta Platform Inc | 1.94% | 3.76% | 1.82% |
| TTWOTake-Two Interactive Software, Inc. | 0.06% | 3.09% | 3.03% |
| DISWalt Disney Co | 0.27% | 2.45% | 2.18% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.18% | 1.54% | 0.36% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 0.25% | 2.11% | 1.86% |
44.8% of METV is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or METV?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while METV charges 0.59%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or METV?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.08% vs +5.72% for METV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or METV?
METV has been the more volatile fund at 27.0% annualized versus 15.6% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -24.5% vs METV -59.6%.
Should I hold both IVV and METV?
IVV and METV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and METV?
44.8% of METV's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 44.8% of METV's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 17 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 39 in METV.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or METV?
IVV yields 1.10% while METV yields 0.18%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is METV better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 5Y and the full window, METV over 3Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 53.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.