METV vs VXUS
Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | METV | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.58% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $213M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 42 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +0.36% | +15.24% | |
| 1Y Return | -0.65% | +26.32% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.66% | +19.85% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.61% | +9.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 26.9% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -59.6% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Roundhill Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 30, 2021 | Jan 26, 2011 |
METV vs VXUS Performance
Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) is a ETF from Roundhill Investments and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year METV returned -0.65% while VXUS returned +26.32%. Year to date, METV is up 0.36% versus a gain of 15.24% for VXUS.
Over three years, METV compounded at +24.66% per year against +19.85% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +5.61% and +9.23% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, METV has the edge at +4.95% annualized vs +4.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
METV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.9% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -59.6% for METV and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
METV charges 0.58% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $58 vs $5 annually, a gap of $53 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, METV currently yields 0.00% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
METV and VXUS share 5 holdings out of 7896 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, METV or VXUS?
METV has an expense ratio of 0.58% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $53 per year of difference.
Which performed better, METV or VXUS?
Over the past year METV returned -0.65% vs +26.32% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), METV annualized +4.95% vs +4.89% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, METV or VXUS?
METV has been the more volatile fund at 26.9% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: METV -59.6% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both METV and VXUS?
METV and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between METV and VXUS?
METV and VXUS share 5 common holdings with a 2.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7896 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, METV or VXUS?
METV yields 0.00% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.