METV vs VYM
Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | METV | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.58% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $213M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 42 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +0.36% | +16.78% | |
| 1Y Return | -0.65% | +24.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.66% | +18.60% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.61% | +12.30% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 26.9% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -59.6% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Roundhill Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 30, 2021 | Nov 10, 2006 |
METV vs VYM Performance
Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) is a ETF from Roundhill Investments and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year METV returned -0.65% while VYM returned +24.43%. Year to date, METV is up 0.36% versus a gain of 16.78% for VYM.
Over three years, METV compounded at +24.66% per year against +18.60% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +5.61% and +12.30% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.11% annualized vs +4.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
METV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.9% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -59.6% for METV and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.49. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
METV charges 0.58% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $58 vs $4 annually, a gap of $54 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, METV currently yields 0.00% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, METV or VYM?
METV has an expense ratio of 0.58% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $54 per year of difference.
Which performed better, METV or VYM?
Over the past year METV returned -0.65% vs +24.43% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), METV annualized +4.95% vs +7.11% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, METV or VYM?
METV has been the more volatile fund at 26.9% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: METV -59.6% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both METV and VYM?
METV and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.49, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between METV and VYM?
METV and VYM share 2 common holdings with a 0.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 596 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, METV or VYM?
METV yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.