IVV vs MKTN

IVV vs MKTN
See what your portfolio actually owns
Your funds unpacked, overlap, fees and score, free on screen. The full report is $25, once. Download sample.
X-ray my portfolio free

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVVMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVMKTNWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%2.10%
AUM$907.0B$121M
Dividend Yield1.10%0.48%
Holdings508387
YTD Return+12.71%+6.87%
1Y Return+21.89%+9.93%
3Y Return (annualized)+22.08%-
5Y Return (annualized)+12.96%-
Volatility (annualized)15.1%-
Max Drawdown-56.5%-4.1%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Federated Hermes
CategoryEquityAlternative
InceptionMay 15, 2000Sep 24, 2025

IVV vs MKTN Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral ETF (MKTN) is a ETF from Federated Hermes. Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% while MKTN returned +9.93%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.71% versus a gain of 6.87% for MKTN.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -4.1% for MKTN. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while MKTN charges 2.10%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $210 annually, a gap of $207 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.48% for MKTN.

Holdings Overlap

10.8%overlap

IVV and MKTN share 165 holdings out of 724 unique holdings combined, representing a 10.8% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in MKTNDifference
NVDA7.76%0.41%7.35%
MSFT4.57%0.04%4.53%
TRV0.12%2.99%2.87%
ABBVProProPro
FIProProPro
GEProProPro
INTUProProPro
GEVProProPro
CRWDProProPro
NFLXProProPro
FundXLS Pro
See the top 10 holdings IVV shares with MKTN
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every position in this table.
Unlock FundXLS Pro$45/quarter Pro · Cancel anytime

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or MKTN?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while MKTN charges 2.10%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $207 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IVV or MKTN?

Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% vs +9.93% for MKTN, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and MKTN?

IVV and MKTN share 165 common holdings with a 10.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 724 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or MKTN?

IVV yields 1.10% while MKTN yields 0.48%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See what your portfolio actually owns
Your funds unpacked, overlap, fees and score, free on screen. The full report is $25, once. Download sample.
X-ray my portfolio free