IVV vs NTSE
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. NTSE delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | NTSE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.32% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $54M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 439 | |
| YTD Return | +13.43% | +18.69% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.61% | +39.17% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.47% | +21.85% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.26% | +5.57% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 19.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -42.8% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | WisdomTree Investments | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | May 18, 2021 |
IVV vs NTSE Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund (NTSE) is a ETF from WisdomTree Investments. Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% while NTSE returned +39.17%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.43% versus a gain of 18.69% for NTSE.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.47% per year against +21.85% for NTSE; over five years the annualized figures are +13.26% and +5.57% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.03% annualized vs +5.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NTSE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.9% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -42.8% for NTSE. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.65. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while NTSE charges 0.32%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $32 annually, a gap of $29 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 2.59% for NTSE.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and NTSE share 0 holdings out of 924 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or NTSE?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while NTSE charges 0.32%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $29 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or NTSE?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% vs +39.17% for NTSE, so NTSE leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), IVV annualized +7.03% vs +5.20% for NTSE. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or NTSE?
NTSE has been the more volatile fund at 19.9% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs NTSE -42.8%.
Should I hold both IVV and NTSE?
IVV and NTSE have a monthly-return correlation of 0.65, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and NTSE?
IVV and NTSE share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 924 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or NTSE?
IVV yields 1.09% while NTSE yields 2.59%, so NTSE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.