NTSE vs VYM
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. NTSE delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NTSE | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.32% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $54M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.59% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 439 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +18.69% | +16.16% | |
| 1Y Return | +39.17% | +26.05% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.85% | +18.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.57% | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.9% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -42.8% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | WisdomTree Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 18, 2021 | Nov 10, 2006 |
NTSE vs VYM Performance
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund (NTSE) is a ETF from WisdomTree Investments and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NTSE returned +39.17% while VYM returned +26.05%. Year to date, NTSE is up 18.69% versus a gain of 16.16% for VYM.
Over three years, NTSE compounded at +21.85% per year against +18.43% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +5.57% and +12.21% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.09% annualized vs +5.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NTSE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.9% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -42.8% for NTSE and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.58. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NTSE charges 0.32% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $32 vs $4 annually, a gap of $28 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NTSE currently yields 2.59% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
NTSE and VYM share 0 holdings out of 977 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NTSE or VYM?
NTSE has an expense ratio of 0.32% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $28 per year of difference.
Which performed better, NTSE or VYM?
Over the past year NTSE returned +39.17% vs +26.05% for VYM, so NTSE leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), NTSE annualized +5.20% vs +7.09% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, NTSE or VYM?
NTSE has been the more volatile fund at 19.9% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: NTSE -42.8% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both NTSE and VYM?
NTSE and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.58, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between NTSE and VYM?
NTSE and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 977 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, NTSE or VYM?
NTSE yields 2.59% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.