NTSE vs SCHD
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. NTSE delivered stronger 1-year returns. NTSE offers more diversification with 419 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NTSE | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.32% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $54M | $103.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.59% | 3.31% | |
| Holdings | 439 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +20.91% | +26.21% | |
| 1Y Return | +37.52% | +29.99% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.57% | +15.73% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.17% | +9.67% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.0% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -42.8% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | WisdomTree Investments | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 18, 2021 | Oct 20, 2011 |
NTSE vs SCHD Performance
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund (NTSE) is a ETF from WisdomTree Investments and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year NTSE returned +37.52% while SCHD returned +29.99%. Year to date, NTSE is up 20.91% versus a gain of 26.21% for SCHD.
Over three years, NTSE compounded at +22.57% per year against +15.73% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +6.17% and +9.67% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.50% annualized vs +5.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NTSE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.0% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -42.8% for NTSE and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.53. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NTSE charges 0.32% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $32 vs $6 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NTSE currently yields 2.59% against 3.31% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
NTSE and SCHD share 0 holdings out of 519 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NTSE or SCHD?
NTSE has an expense ratio of 0.32% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $26 per year of difference.
Which performed better, NTSE or SCHD?
Over the past year NTSE returned +37.52% vs +29.99% for SCHD, so NTSE leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), NTSE annualized +5.57% vs +11.50% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, NTSE or SCHD?
NTSE has been the more volatile fund at 20.0% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: NTSE -42.8% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both NTSE and SCHD?
NTSE and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.53, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between NTSE and SCHD?
NTSE and SCHD share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 519 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, NTSE or SCHD?
NTSE yields 2.59% while SCHD yields 3.31%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.