NTSE vs VXUS
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. NTSE delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NTSE | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.32% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $54M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.59% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 439 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +18.69% | +14.19% | |
| 1Y Return | +39.17% | +27.38% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.85% | +19.53% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.57% | +9.03% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.9% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -42.8% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | WisdomTree Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 18, 2021 | Jan 26, 2011 |
NTSE vs VXUS Performance
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund (NTSE) is a ETF from WisdomTree Investments and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NTSE returned +39.17% while VXUS returned +27.38%. Year to date, NTSE is up 18.69% versus a gain of 14.19% for VXUS.
Over three years, NTSE compounded at +21.85% per year against +19.53% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +5.57% and +9.03% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, NTSE has the edge at +5.20% annualized vs +4.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NTSE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.9% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -42.8% for NTSE and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NTSE charges 0.32% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $32 vs $5 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NTSE currently yields 2.59% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
NTSE and VXUS share 296 holdings out of 7984 unique holdings combined, representing a 10.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NTSE or VXUS?
NTSE has an expense ratio of 0.32% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $27 per year of difference.
Which performed better, NTSE or VXUS?
Over the past year NTSE returned +39.17% vs +27.38% for VXUS, so NTSE leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), NTSE annualized +5.20% vs +4.83% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, NTSE or VXUS?
NTSE has been the more volatile fund at 19.9% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: NTSE -42.8% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both NTSE and VXUS?
NTSE and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between NTSE and VXUS?
NTSE and VXUS share 296 common holdings with a 10.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7984 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, NTSE or VXUS?
NTSE yields 2.59% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.