IVV vs OZEM
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Roundhill GLP-1 & Weight Loss ETF
Which is better, IVV or OZEM?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | OZEM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.59% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $64M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 1.24% |
| Holdings | 508 | 27 |
| YTD Return | +12.53%Best | -10.33% |
| 1Y Return | +15.78%Best | +14.02% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.89% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.77% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.8%Best | 20.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8%Best | -28.6% |
| $10,000 over 2.4 years | $14,895Best | $12,349 |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Roundhill Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | May 21, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 21, 2024 to Sep 30, 2026 (2.4 years).
IVV vs OZEM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.4 years both funds cover.
IVV vs OZEM Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Roundhill GLP-1 & Weight Loss ETF (OZEM) is an ETF from Roundhill Investments. Over the past year IVV returned +15.78% while OZEM returned +14.02%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.53% versus a loss of 10.33% for OZEM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
OZEM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.1% compared with 11.8% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -28.6% for OZEM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.27. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while OZEM charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $59 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 1.24% for OZEM.
Holdings Overlap
At least 2.2% of IVV's money is in holdings OZEM also owns.
Stated as a floor: for OZEM, our book for it covers 87.5% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
IVV and OZEM share little of their money.
4 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 23 in OZEM, against full books of 508 and 27.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and OZEM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or OZEM?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while OZEM charges 0.59%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or OZEM?
Over the past year IVV returned +15.78% vs +14.02% for OZEM, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +18.06% vs +9.19% for OZEM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or OZEM?
OZEM has been the more volatile fund at 20.1% annualized versus 11.8% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs OZEM -28.6%.
Should I hold both IVV and OZEM?
IVV and OZEM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.27, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and OZEM?
At least 2.2% of IVV's money is in holdings OZEM also owns. Our book for OZEM is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 4 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 23 in OZEM.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or OZEM?
IVV yields 1.06% while OZEM yields 1.24%, so OZEM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is OZEM better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.