IVV vs PHOX
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Aura AI Photonics ETF
Which is better, IVV or PHOX?
IVV costs less.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 65.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | PHOX |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.60% |
| AUM | $882.6B | $2M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 508 | 27 |
| YTD Return | +13.60%Best | +1.31% |
| 1Y Return | +16.32% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.81% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.03% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.1%Best | 65.1% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Aura ETFs Inc. |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Aug 10, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
IVV vs PHOX growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs PHOX Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Aura AI Photonics ETF (PHOX) is an ETF from Aura ETFs Inc.. Year to date, IVV is up 13.60% versus a gain of 1.31% for PHOX.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while PHOX charges 0.60%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $60 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.00% for PHOX.
Holdings Overlap
4.0% of IVV's money is in holdings PHOX also owns. 40.6% of PHOX's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
8 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 26 in PHOX, against full books of 508 and 27.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 7 positions for PHOX that do not appear in our book for IVV (10.9% of the fund), and 489 for IVV that do not appear in PHOX (95.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in PHOX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| LITELumentum Holdings Inc | 0.11% | 12.68% | 12.57% |
| COHRCoherent Corp | 0.09% | 8.84% | 8.75% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.59% | 4.03% | 1.44% |
| ANETArista Networks Inc Common Stock | 0.31% | 3.89% | 3.58% |
| MRVLMarvell Technology Group Ltd. | 0.31% | 3.88% | 3.57% |
| APHAmphenol Corp. Class A | 0.31% | 3.86% | 3.55% |
| GLWCorning Inc. | 0.20% | 2.53% | 2.33% |
| CIENCiena Corp | 0.07% | 0.92% | 0.85% |
40.6% of PHOX is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or PHOX?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while PHOX charges 0.60%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and PHOX?
40.6% of PHOX's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 40.6% of PHOX's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 8 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 26 in PHOX.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or PHOX?
IVV yields 1.06% while PHOX yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PHOX better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 65.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.