IVV vs QCLR
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | QCLR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.25% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $3M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 15.35% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +12.71% | -1.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.89% | +2.74% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.08% | +16.53% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.96% | +9.03% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 13.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -21.8% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Global X by mirae Asset | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Aug 25, 2021 |
IVV vs QCLR Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset. Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% while QCLR returned +2.74%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.71% versus a loss of 1.57% for QCLR.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.08% per year against +16.53% for QCLR; over five years the annualized figures are +12.96% and +9.03% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, QCLR has the edge at +9.03% annualized vs +7.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 13.1% for QCLR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -21.8% for QCLR. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while QCLR charges 0.25%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $25 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 15.35% for QCLR.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and QCLR share 74 holdings out of 518 unique holdings combined, representing a 17.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or QCLR?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while QCLR charges 0.25%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $22 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or QCLR?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% vs +2.74% for QCLR, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), IVV annualized +7.00% vs +9.03% for QCLR. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or QCLR?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 13.1% for QCLR. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs QCLR -21.8%.
Should I hold both IVV and QCLR?
IVV and QCLR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and QCLR?
IVV and QCLR share 74 common holdings with a 17.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 518 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or QCLR?
IVV yields 1.10% while QCLR yields 15.35%, so QCLR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.