QCLR vs VXUS
Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QCLR | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $3M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 14.69% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 107 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | -0.75% | +14.19% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.90% | +27.38% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.17% | +19.53% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.26% | +9.03% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.1% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -21.8% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 25, 2021 | Jan 26, 2011 |
QCLR vs VXUS Performance
Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QCLR returned +2.90% while VXUS returned +27.38%. Year to date, QCLR is down 0.75% versus a gain of 14.19% for VXUS.
Over three years, QCLR compounded at +16.17% per year against +19.53% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +9.26% and +9.03% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, QCLR has the edge at +9.26% annualized vs +4.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 13.1% for QCLR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.8% for QCLR and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.53. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QCLR charges 0.25% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $5 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QCLR currently yields 14.69% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
QCLR and VXUS share 5 holdings out of 7943 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QCLR or VXUS?
QCLR has an expense ratio of 0.25% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $20 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QCLR or VXUS?
Over the past year QCLR returned +2.90% vs +27.38% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), QCLR annualized +9.26% vs +4.83% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QCLR or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 13.1% for QCLR. Worst drawdown: QCLR -21.8% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both QCLR and VXUS?
QCLR and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.53, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QCLR and VXUS?
QCLR and VXUS share 5 common holdings with a 1.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7943 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QCLR or VXUS?
QCLR yields 14.69% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so QCLR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.