QCLR vs VXUS
Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, QCLR or VXUS?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. QCLR led over the full window, VXUS over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QCLR | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $4M | $163.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 15.07% | 2.34% |
| Holdings | 215 | 8,844 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.8%Best | 15.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -21.8%Best | -29.4% |
| $10,000 over 5.1 years | $15,614Best | $15,011 |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 25, 2021 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 10 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. QCLR has data through Oct 16, 2026 and VXUS through Oct 26, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 5.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 26, 2021 to Oct 16, 2026 (5.1 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 12.8% for QCLR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.8% for QCLR and -29.4% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.52. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QCLR charges 0.25% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $5 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QCLR currently yields 15.07% against 2.34% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
At least 4.2% of QCLR's money is in holdings VXUS also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VXUS, our book for it covers 91.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
QCLR and VXUS share little of their money.
5 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in QCLR and 8,425 in VXUS, against full books of 215 and 8,844.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QCLR and VXUS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QCLR or VXUS?
QCLR has an expense ratio of 0.25% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $20 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, QCLR or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 12.8% for QCLR. Worst drawdown: QCLR -21.8% vs VXUS -29.4%.
Should I hold both QCLR and VXUS?
QCLR and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.52, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QCLR and VXUS?
At least 4.2% of QCLR's money is in holdings VXUS also owns. Our book for VXUS is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 5 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in QCLR and 8,425 in VXUS.
Which pays a higher dividend, QCLR or VXUS?
QCLR yields 15.07% while VXUS yields 2.34%, so QCLR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than QCLR?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. QCLR led over the full window, VXUS over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.