QCLR vs VYM
Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, QCLR or VYM?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QCLR | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $4M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 15.23% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 108 | 613 |
| YTD Return | -2.36% | +13.91%Best |
| 1Y Return | -0.96% | +17.57%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.51% | +18.12%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.60% | +12.17%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.0%Best | 13.7% |
| Max Drawdown | -21.8% | -15.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,106 | $17,758Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 45.7% | 25.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Aug 25, 2021 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 26, 2021 to Sep 11, 2026 (5 years).
QCLR vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5 years both funds cover.
QCLR vs VYM Performance
Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QCLR returned -0.96% while VYM returned +17.57%. Year to date, QCLR is down 2.36% versus a gain of 13.91% for VYM.
Over three years, QCLR compounded at +15.51% per year against +18.12% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +8.60% and +12.17% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.7% compared with 13.0% for QCLR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.8% for QCLR and -15.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.40. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QCLR charges 0.25% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $4 annually, a gap of $21 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QCLR currently yields 15.23% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
17.2% of QCLR's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 20.0% of VYM's money is in holdings QCLR also owns.
VYM and QCLR share little of their money.
28 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QCLR and 603 in VYM, against full books of 108 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 540 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for QCLR (77.5% of the fund), and 66 for QCLR that do not appear in VYM (78.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QCLR | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.08% | 7.29% | 4.21% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 2.05% | 1.93% | 0.12% |
| TXNTexas Instruments, Inc | 1.12% | 1.13% | 0.01% |
| LINLinde Plc Ordinary Shares | 0.97% | 0.99% | 0.02% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 0.91% | 0.75% | 0.16% |
| ADIAnalog Devices, Inc. | 0.81% | 0.80% | 0.01% |
| PEPPepsico Inc. | 0.83% | 0.77% | 0.06% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 0.75% | 0.81% | 0.06% |
| GILDGilead Sciences Inc | 0.73% | 0.65% | 0.08% |
| TMUST-Mobile Usa Inc Esrw Usd Npv Ref Sm#585558 | 0.83% | 0.34% | 0.49% |
20.0% of VYM is already inside QCLR.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QCLR or VYM?
QCLR has an expense ratio of 0.25% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $21 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QCLR or VYM?
Over the past year QCLR returned -0.96% vs +17.57% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QCLR or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 13.7% annualized versus 13.0% for QCLR. Worst drawdown: QCLR -21.8% vs VYM -15.8%.
Should I hold both QCLR and VYM?
QCLR and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.40, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QCLR and VYM?
20.0% of VYM's money is in holdings QCLR also owns. 20.0% of VYM's is in holdings QCLR also owns. They hold 28 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QCLR and 603 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, QCLR or VYM?
QCLR yields 15.23% while VYM yields 2.22%, so QCLR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than QCLR?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.