QCLR vs VYM
Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QCLR | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $3M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 15.35% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +0.34% | +16.42% | |
| 1Y Return | +3.24% | +24.22% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.01% | +19.03% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.48% | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.1% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -21.8% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 25, 2021 | Nov 10, 2006 |
QCLR vs VYM Performance
Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QCLR returned +3.24% while VYM returned +24.22%. Year to date, QCLR is up 0.34% versus a gain of 16.42% for VYM.
Over three years, QCLR compounded at +17.01% per year against +19.03% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +9.48% and +12.21% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, QCLR has the edge at +9.48% annualized vs +7.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 13.1% for QCLR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.8% for QCLR and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.40. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QCLR charges 0.25% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $4 annually, a gap of $21 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QCLR currently yields 15.35% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
QCLR and VYM share 26 holdings out of 664 unique holdings combined, representing a 10.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QCLR or VYM?
QCLR has an expense ratio of 0.25% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $21 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QCLR or VYM?
Over the past year QCLR returned +3.24% vs +24.22% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), QCLR annualized +9.48% vs +7.10% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QCLR or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 13.1% for QCLR. Worst drawdown: QCLR -21.8% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both QCLR and VYM?
QCLR and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.40, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QCLR and VYM?
QCLR and VYM share 26 common holdings with a 10.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 664 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QCLR or VYM?
QCLR yields 15.35% while VYM yields 2.24%, so QCLR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.