IVV vs QQA

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVVMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVQQAWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%0.29%
AUM$865.2B$778M
Dividend Yield1.09%9.53%
Holdings508122
YTD Return+13.80%+13.42%
1Y Return+23.01%+21.87%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.77%-
5Y Return (annualized)+13.39%-
Volatility (annualized)15.1%12.8%
Max Drawdown-56.5%-19.7%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Invesco (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionMay 15, 2000Jul 17, 2024

IVV vs QQA Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year IVV returned +23.01% while QQA returned +21.87%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a gain of 13.42% for QQA.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 12.8% for QQA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -19.7% for QQA. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while QQA charges 0.29%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $29 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 9.53% for QQA.

Holdings Overlap

45.5%overlap

IVV and QQA share 88 holdings out of 529 unique holdings combined, representing a 45.5% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in QQADifference
NVDA7.76%5.83%1.93%
AAPL7.44%5.11%2.33%
MSFT4.57%3.38%1.19%
AMZNProProPro
MUProProPro
GOOGLProProPro
AVGOProProPro
GOOGProProPro
METAProProPro
TSLAProProPro
FundXLS Pro
See all 10 holdings IVV shares with QQA
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
X-ray my whole portfolio$45/quarter Pro · Cancel anytime

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or QQA?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while QQA charges 0.29%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $26 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IVV or QQA?

Over the past year IVV returned +23.01% vs +21.87% for QQA, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs +19.11% for QQA. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IVV or QQA?

IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 12.8% for QQA. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs QQA -19.7%.

Should I hold both IVV and QQA?

IVV and QQA have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and QQA?

IVV and QQA share 88 common holdings with a 45.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 529 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or QQA?

IVV yields 1.09% while QQA yields 9.53%, so QQA currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.