IVV vs QQQI
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | QQQI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.68% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $14.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 14.38% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 106 | |
| YTD Return | +12.28% | +9.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.94% | +17.56% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.81% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.05% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 12.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -20.0% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | NEOS | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jan 30, 2024 |
IVV vs QQQI Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) is a ETF from NEOS. Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% while QQQI returned +17.56%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.28% versus a gain of 9.14% for QQQI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 12.6% for QQQI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -20.0% for QQQI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while QQQI charges 0.68%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $68 annually, a gap of $65 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 14.38% for QQQI.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and QQQI share 86 holdings out of 522 unique holdings combined, representing a 53.0% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or QQQI?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while QQQI charges 0.68%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $65 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or QQQI?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% vs +17.56% for QQQI, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), IVV annualized +6.98% vs +18.12% for QQQI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or QQQI?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 12.6% for QQQI. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs QQQI -20.0%.
Should I hold both IVV and QQQI?
IVV and QQQI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and QQQI?
IVV and QQQI share 86 common holdings with a 53.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 522 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or QQQI?
IVV yields 1.10% while QQQI yields 14.38%, so QQQI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.