QQQI vs VYM
NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQI | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.68% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $14.2B | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 14.38% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 106 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +9.73% | +15.60% | |
| 1Y Return | +17.65% | +23.48% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.07% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.50% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.6% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -20.0% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | NEOS | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 30, 2024 | Nov 10, 2006 |
QQQI vs VYM Performance
NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) is a ETF from NEOS and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QQQI returned +17.65% while VYM returned +23.48%. Year to date, QQQI is up 9.73% versus a gain of 15.60% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 12.6% for QQQI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.0% for QQQI and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.47. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQI charges 0.68% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $68 vs $4 annually, a gap of $64 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQI currently yields 14.38% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
QQQI and VYM share 28 holdings out of 678 unique holdings combined, representing a 15.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQI or VYM?
QQQI has an expense ratio of 0.68% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $64 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQI or VYM?
Over the past year QQQI returned +17.65% vs +23.48% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), QQQI annualized +18.39% vs +7.05% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQI or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 12.6% for QQQI. Worst drawdown: QQQI -20.0% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both QQQI and VYM?
QQQI and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.47, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQI and VYM?
QQQI and VYM share 28 common holdings with a 15.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 678 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQI or VYM?
QQQI yields 14.38% while VYM yields 2.24%, so QQQI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.