QQQI vs VYM
NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, QQQI or VYM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQI | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.68% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $15.3B | $78.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 13.76% | 2.37% |
| Holdings | 209 | 608 |
| YTD Return | +6.82% | +15.12%Best |
| 1Y Return | +6.23% | +19.10%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.95% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.68% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.3% | 11.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -20.0% | -14.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.7 years | $14,870 | $15,350Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.5% | 25.8%Best |
| Fund Family | NEOS | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jan 30, 2024 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 30, 2024 to Oct 30, 2026 (2.7 years).
QQQI vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.7 years both funds cover.
QQQI vs VYM Performance
NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) is an ETF from NEOS and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QQQI returned +6.23% while VYM returned +19.10%. Year to date, QQQI is up 6.82% versus a gain of 15.12% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.3% compared with 11.0% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.0% for QQQI and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.27. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQI charges 0.68% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $68 vs $4 annually, a gap of $64 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQI currently yields 13.76% against 2.37% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
16.3% of QQQI's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 19.1% of VYM's money is in holdings QQQI also owns.
VYM and QQQI share little of their money.
27 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in QQQI and 602 in VYM, against full books of 209 and 608.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 548 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for QQQI (79.2% of the fund), and 69 for QQQI that do not appear in VYM (80.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QQQI | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.61% | 6.94% | 4.33% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.93% | 1.76% | 0.17% |
| TXNTexas Instrument Inc | 1.05% | 0.96% | 0.09% |
| LINLinde Plc Ordinary Shares | 0.94% | 0.91% | 0.03% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 0.91% | 0.86% | 0.05% |
| PEPPepsico Inc. | 0.82% | 0.77% | 0.05% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 0.83% | 0.72% | 0.11% |
| GILDGilead Sciences | 0.80% | 0.73% | 0.07% |
| ADIAnalog Devices, Inc. | 0.77% | 0.71% | 0.06% |
| TMUST-Mobile Usa Inc Esrw Usd Npv Ref Sm#585558 | 0.87% | 0.35% | 0.52% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QQQI and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQI or VYM?
QQQI has an expense ratio of 0.68% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $64 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQI or VYM?
Over the past year QQQI returned +6.23% vs +19.10% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQQI or VYM?
QQQI has been the more volatile fund at 13.3% annualized versus 11.0% for VYM. Worst drawdown: QQQI -20.0% vs VYM -14.5%.
Should I hold both QQQI and VYM?
QQQI and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.27, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQI and VYM?
19.1% of VYM's money is in holdings QQQI also owns. 19.1% of VYM's is in holdings QQQI also owns. They hold 27 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in QQQI and 602 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQI or VYM?
QQQI yields 13.76% while VYM yields 2.37%, so QQQI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than QQQI?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.