IVV vs QQXL
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs ProShares Ultra QQQ Top 30
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. QQXL delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | QQXL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.95% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $6M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.86% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 36 | |
| YTD Return | +12.39% | +22.04% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.24% | +35.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.78% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.84% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 50.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -27.3% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | ProShares | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Aug 13, 2025 |
IVV vs QQXL Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and ProShares Ultra QQQ Top 30 (QQXL) is a ETF from ProShares. Over the past year IVV returned +20.24% while QQXL returned +35.35%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.39% versus a gain of 22.04% for QQXL.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQXL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 50.4% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -27.3% for QQXL. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while QQXL charges 0.95%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $95 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.86% for QQXL.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and QQXL share 29 holdings out of 507 unique holdings combined, representing a 10.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or QQXL?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while QQXL charges 0.95%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or QQXL?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.24% vs +35.35% for QQXL, so QQXL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +6.98% vs +31.00% for QQXL. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or QQXL?
QQXL has been the more volatile fund at 50.4% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs QQXL -27.3%.
Should I hold both IVV and QQXL?
IVV and QQXL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and QQXL?
IVV and QQXL share 29 common holdings with a 10.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 507 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or QQXL?
IVV yields 1.10% while QQXL yields 0.86%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.